namaste, mothafuckas
new (r)age (against the scene)
Sat, May 19, 2007 - 6:18 PMA fair portion of the workshop was a talk about progressive movements, altered states, connection with spirituality, and most importantly, consciousness-raising, examples ranging from feminism to the environmentalist movement. It was a great talk by a great academic. Lots of stuff I already knew, but was a wonderful way to establish some sort of connection with this thinker. Awesome.
And there was the guided meditation, which, while nice, had no context, and I wasn't particularly sure why we were doing it. Neither did my partner. We were both fairly nonplussed by the experience. Harmless, but not particularly enlightening.
But then there was the participant who believed that the Archangel Michael was cosmically sending her chants to sing in the shower, chants to Jesus and God and the angels and that he was speaking directly through her. And our dear sweet academic presented an example of spiritual healing about a healer in Hawaii who has spent time energetically cleansing Washington, DC (okay, maybe there's some merit there) and the graves of supposed cannibalistic Hawaiian tribal leaders (uh...). And the very talented musician who had us stand in a circle singing chants from South American tribes in order to channel their forest spirits (while swaying back and forth, eyes closed, no less). It took so much energy on my part to keep my eyes from their tendency to roll (I swear, I'm trying, peeps).
Okay. So people have different ways of understanding the world around them. They have a whole plethora of methods to make sense of the unexplainable, to create connection between themselves and the divine or nature, to create meaning in their lives and live well by that meaning. Who am I to judge? I pray to rocks, right? <grin>
But I am judging. I left that workshop laughing, giggling at the madness of humanity, and also happy to have heard some smarts from this academic, at the very least. But I also left feeling very uneasy, having to sort out what I was judging, why I was judging, and if it was okay that I was doing so even though it wasn't being done meanly. And after much thought and conversation on the ride home, I decided that yes, in fact, I have both the right and the responsibility to judge. Yes, I said the responsibility.
I'm making judgement on what matters. What matters when we live in a fucked up world full of poverty, genocide, rage, corruption, apathy, and a whole slew of -isms. What matters when we, as supposedly progressive thinking humans, need to decide where we put our energy regarding how we heal the world, ourselves, and those around us. I'm all for personal spirituality, connecting with nature, the divine, love, whatever you want to call it, however you want to conceive of it. Whatever it is that makes you a better human, that allows you to be solid and grounded and complete. However, I fear that there's an enormous potential for losing sight of the suffering that's going on this world and of what kind of energy is needed to help alleviate some of this suffering. That it's so easy to lose sight of actual change and healing, versus the infinite creative ways we can convince ourselves that we're making change. To be blunt, I'm sorry, cleansing the graves of cannibalistic Hawaiian icons is probably not really what we need right now in our world of limited resources, energy, good hearts, and creative minds.
What you do matters. What you say matters. When you tell me and others about humans who spend their time energetically healing dead people (and not only tell me, but use it as an example of positive social change) you are telling people that it really doesn't matter how they decide to help the world, that only their intentions matter, that if they feel good about what they're doing, then it's just as important as those consciousness raising circles of the feminist ’60s and Rachel Carlson’s enormous contribution of the “Silent Spring” to the environmentalist movement. I try to avoid cliches, but you know the one about intentions and hell...
I judge because I seriously fear that we are so privileged that a) not only will we take our privilege and run with it in the name of good (which can have its benefits overall), but that b) we'll wind up forgetting that we are privileged and consider what we've got (in the name of Spirituality) to be a free pass to act like assholes. New age, kind, warm, spiritual assholes, but assholes nonetheless.
It's my responsibility to judge, because if I don't, who's going to hold others accountable. Who's going to be able to straddle the need for spirituality and meaning in one's life with the understanding of a need for outright change, passion, and revolution in this country and in the world. And not in the white hippie "I'm so counter-cultural look at me go" way, but in the very real, cross-cultural, messy, political, social way. You know, the way that matters...
Sat, May 19, 2007 - 6:18 PM -
permalink -
7 Comments
7 Comments |
add a comment |
|
Sat, May 19, 2007 - 6:43 PM
i'm right there with u, it seems the more people talk about how spiritual they are and how much they've studied on an esoteric / metaphysical plane that it loses merit and seems to just feed their ego. there is a lot to learn out there, only we choose who we want to teach us and what we want to believe in this life. i am very hesitant to let people who call themselves shamans "guide" me in meditation. i think that word gets a little abused in our community. thanks for sharing that...d |
|
Sat, May 19, 2007 - 9:24 PM
thank you so much, mary, for putting this so thoughtfully out there.
this idea of judgment and whether or not it is productive is one that everyone should consider deeply. "judge not lest ye be judged" is a good rule to live by in terms of superficial differences, but that mantra was established in a world where mass communication and the enormous consequences of our modern culture didn't exist. i too feel that judgment - when done productively in order to further common good - is necessary in today's world where so many get distracted (not to mention brainwashed) and forget where things come from, what effects they have on others, and what the core issues are. if no one steps up and says "hey -what you're doing is destructive", then everyone feels free to keep doing what they're doing, particularly in "counter-culture" (sub)cultures that insist what they're doing is creating change, when really, all it is in another 1st world lifestyle and has very little impact on anyone outside of themselves. and yes, i too find a lot of elements of the progressive movement to be completely self-serving and ineffective in terms of our completely globalized problems. the current superficial greenwashing of otherwise harmful corporations who are changing their PR image but not their ways is only one example of how people pander to cultural trends while not actually achieving any change or conflict resolution, and progressives who choose to focus on some obscure spiritual practice instead of working on the real issues of the world aren't much better. IMO, believe whatever you want to believe - Archangel Michael singers included - but if you want to create change, you need to DO what needs to be done, not use your beliefs to create excuses to avoid doing the hard work. i personally do not judge beliefs; i judge actions. if chanting over graves and worshipping crystals is what you want to do and how you want to spend your time, fine, it's good for YOU and your spirituality, but don't sit there and tell me it's gonna save the planet or help resolve some of the serious social issues that exist today. as i recently wrote in my blog, i find it to be culturally selfish to claim you're "being the change" but sacrificing nothing. spiritual assholes, indeed. (and i fully admit that i often include myself in that category). |
|
Sun, May 20, 2007 - 12:03 PM
I often wonder how much self serving spirituality (from indigenous practices to western organized religion to new age movements) is necessary for the preservation of (relative) mass sanity given the constructs of the world in which we live. Are most people capable of living in a world full of poverty, genocide, rage, corruption, apathy, and a whole slew of -isms without dedicating their lives to their own self preservation through spirituality, no matter how strange or offensive it may be? Without participation in these new age-y practices, would those who identify themselves as part of the progressive movement, become a more significant part of the perpetuation of the military industrial emperialist hegemony? Perhaps singing to Archangel Michael, having medicine practice, or watching The Secret isn't actually moving towards correcting any of the vast number of atrocities that this world is facing. But then again, those practices might keep another privileged white american from tipping the scales further in the direction of destruction. They might need their sage, their altars, their Namaste just to keep themselves from shopping at Walmart and watching Fox news.
I say embrace the people who do their new age business because it keeps them on our side. I fear most people aren't capable (emotionally, intellectually and/or spiritually) of doing anything more than keeping themselves sane enough to embrace the mere idea of healing the planet. Perhaps we need to recognize that healing themselves isn't doing nothing, but is a gift of another person not actively working against you and i creating the change we seek. |
|
Sun, May 20, 2007 - 12:36 PM
i agree, stephen, that spiritual practice is necessary. but i think my (and possibly mary's) argument is that people often couch their offbeat spirituality as the key to saving EVERYONE and therefore only spend their time, talent an attention on that, and i just don't buy it. this world is in need of so much help, i think everyone has a responsibility to think not just about themselves, but the greater global community. i 100% agree with the "think globally, act locally" sentiment, but also think that, for example, new-age types who spend a lot of time on their own spirituality but then don't pay enough attention to politics to vote in their own local elections (and i know a number of them, unfortunately) is sort of bullshit.
|
|
Sun, May 20, 2007 - 12:48 PM
p.s.
mary, i hope i'm not projecting my interpretation onto your post, and apologize if i did. stephen, i realize that my very non-spiritual POV on this is probably totally different than yours on this subject. if honestly, it's ALL someone can do to keep themselves sane, then by all means, focus on yourself, but i believe the majority of this particular subculture that mary is pointing to (and i am speaking only to that particular group, not the population in general) have the means and are all capable of much more than that and, to get even deeper, believe we are being taught that we aren't. our current culture teaches us that it's more important to always focus on ourselves and that we have no power to change anyone or anything else. i think it's a huge but not insurmountable challenge to overcome this thinking. |
|
Sun, May 20, 2007 - 4:16 PM
Thanks everyone for your comments. It's so great to have others thinking about this. And Amy - you're not projecting, no worries. :)
I have a great deal of compassion for people who can at this point in their lives really only focus on their own growth, their own survival, their own sanity. Absolutely. Life is hard, and shit gets dished out that we can't control, and sometimes that's all someone can deal with. If singing to Archangel Michael helps you and you're not hurting anyone else while doing it, well then, by all means, do it. At the same time, I feel like this still leads back to my original point, that it's my (and your) responsibility to judge these sorts of moves, to watch them, to call them out, because it's a hell of an easy excuse to rest oneself upon, and it's one that our society in general, I would argue, calls us towards like Sirens - our general American culture and our particular subcultures tell us repeatedly that it is mostly the "me" that matters (or in our subculture, the "we", we being defined as our community - that's a whole other conversation about community co-dependence that I won't go into here). And quite frankly, when watching both culture and subcultures, I see this repeated over and over again in action. We are in a community of very privileged, highly functioning, smart, sharp people, and I just can't rest on the excuse that people are doing their best in regards to this issue and that most people now have a free pass to be, well, spiritual assholes. (I'm digging that term... ;) ) And so when I hear others who are part of this proto-spiritual community at large practically justifying this sort of behavior through their own behavior and rhetoric (I use this term in the non-loaded sense, maybe more in the sense of dialectic), I can only see it as even more important to question, to push, and to be skeptical. Again, if not me, who? We can't just fall into complete relativism when it comes to fixing what's fucked up. I find myself, while having this conversation, in such a liminal place - because I've spent the past two years diving into my own shit, my past, my spirituality, my questions, my confusion, me. And so even having this conversation from my current standpoint is a privilege that not everyone has. I recognize that. However, again, I feel like that experience in itself reminds me of how important it is to have an ongoing conversation (and resulting *action*) going on within our culture about social responsibility and pushing our own and one another's boundaries. I'm not self-righteously saying that everyone has to dive into social justice as much, or more, or less than I do. I'm in no place to judge the exact amount people must contribute, that's ridiculous. I certainly judge my own self on this topic and don't need to dictate to (or be dictated to) others what is appropriate. I *am* saying that we can't just give everyone the benefit of the doubt by sitting down and shutting up. That feels irresponsible. I have to hold others and myself accountable to something, and I think a dialogue regarding this issue is a great first step to doing it. And finally, trix, I'm not sure that just by not participating in Fox/Walmart mass culture one is not doing harm. I believe there is a harm in the lack, the lack of action AND of the self-serving use of progressive language, the reappropriation of it, to somehow make oneself feel better about one's spiritual practice. It's dangerous to have effective and meaningful language be co-opted by a less thoughtful and less meaningful rhetoric. We see this happen in media all the time - the reappropriation of radical activist language in order to tone down or take out what that meaning was originally purposed for. It waters movements down. And it worries me. |
|
Sun, May 20, 2007 - 7:38 PM
I agree that someone needs to come out and ask these questions. If questions come from a place of judgement, than I'm all for bringing on the judgement. I have no idea if its people's own limitations that are preventing them from actually serving anyone beyond themselves or if it is any number of things like privileged laziness or whatever. Calling this to people's attention, I agree is necessary. Just as long as we're open to learning that some people just can't do anything more than take care of themselves, no matter how privileged they are.
|
