discussion post on Mon, November 23, 2009 - 3:51 PM
|
!Awesome WebStuff ('Aw Dag!),
Agnostics,
Atheists,
Atheists for Diversity- S.A.V.E.D.,
Atheists Only,
Ayn Rand $ Objectivism,
Complexity Theory,
Crossroads of Religion,
Evolution,
Evolution/Creation Debate,
Faith Versus Reason,
Geology,
Mars,
Objectivist Community,
Peak Oil discussion group,
Philosophy of Science,
Postmodern Theology,
Quantum Physics,
|
You are not connected to Rene
want to grow your network?
Re: Radiocarbon dating offers no support for Evolution
(in Evolution/Creation Debate)
>>"radiocarbon dating cannot help the evolutionist, it does help the creationist. This is because 14C can be found in substances (in situ) such as diamonds and coal. This poses a problem for evolutionists but is not at all surprising to creationis...
read more
Re: Radiocarbon dating offers no support for Evolution
(in Evolution/Creation Debate)
>>"14C has a half-life of 5,730 years and is used to date relatively young fossils."<<
Carbon 14 dating is used mostly in archaeology as it can only date things younger than 60,000 years. You ought to know this, Dan. Why do you want to spread... read more discussion post on Fri, November 20, 2009 - 3:14 PM
Re: Radiocarbon dating offers no support for Evolution
(in Evolution/Creation Debate)
>>"Christianity may be classified as a "religion", but it is really not a religion at all and is as old as the universe itself."<<
More irrefutable evidence of the fully delusional nature of your belief system. discussion post on Fri, November 6, 2009 - 3:52 PM
Re: Foremost Brain Surgeon and Creationist
(in Evolution/Creation Debate)
>>"You are free to design your own logical argument for "everything which has a beginning has no cause""<<
I have already demonstrated on a number of occasions that this argument that you present has no merit and says nothing about the nature o... read more discussion post on Wed, November 4, 2009 - 3:58 PM
Re: Foremost Brain Surgeon and Creationist
(in Evolution/Creation Debate)
Your quote mining is silly, Dan... a lot of apparent foolishness taken out of context. Natural selection is not a random process. You could compare it to whittling a piece of wood to fit a round hole. It acts on natural variation that is presen...
read more
discussion post on Wed, November 4, 2009 - 3:29 PM
|
