per a comment on non duality tribe this date ...

Jane, now that is a most needed sensible question. It is actually the point of my argument for trinity after (to replace) duality rather than attempting the singularity only.

I will attempt to keep to a minimum my often explained meanings of the symbolizations that I use in my two basic formulas of duality as (+/-) and trinity as (+=-), as this has already been done in past comments and is what my suggested book is all about. The basic d... read more

I post this for general interest in it's entirety as presented on my other blog.

I have been following, and just re-read from about half way, I have a few thoughts about the discussion.

There has been much mention of God in this, no problem of course, that is what it IS ALL about. If we were able to limit the definition of God to just one concept, then we would have a true basis of discussion. We seem to unwilling to do so though, which is sad, because there is a concept that would defi... read more

Hey Chaz, Do not be misled by the term nonduality as having only the one meaning that some have been writing about. Most of the world deals in duality where they see things in colors as simple as black and white, hell, even our Pres sees things that way, the leader of the free nation, you are either for him or against him, no middle ground possible in that context.

Another premier duality is the new age concept of duality transcended directly to unity...a 'book' learned idea that takes the... read more

As posted originally as a comment on Gather.com

Gibbs, I thank you for that comment. If you and I can understand each other, then all surely can. Which leads me to comment further to all in general, or specifically as the shoe fits…but if it doesn’t, don’t throw it back, just toss it gently.

I want to make a comment about God here, because so much of everything seems to hinge around the understanding of what that is all about. Some of you have read my messages before, but for the greate... read more

Dear Friend Chandra,

I received your message late in the day, it sounds like I should do my best on it, so will sleep on the question and begin in the AM. It is nice to hear from you.

Well I procrastinated a little, here goes. BTW I have not read any of the previous comments to your posting yet, I will save that for later, if I can find them then.

The statement as presented is beautiful in it's simplicity and truth. I see it as saying that all is in flux and change, what is true at ... read more