collapse module

Thomas

offline 12 friends
joined on 03/09/04
last updated 04/22/08
collapse module

My Friends

view all 12
collapse module

My Feed

More and more we depend on the combination of technology AND connection with other people to seamlessly exist in this mediated world. A breakdown of one or both (as in this case) can leave us stranded (sometimes literally).









Since October 1999, our world has become an even more connected place. For example, would Nicholas White, the man in the video, have had a cell phone in 2008? Likely yes. We live in a world of “On-Star”, Twitter, ubiquitous cell phones, and mobile uploads. Life has truly reverted back to a fundamental collaborative enterprise as we wrestle with technologic complexity.



I recently saw a book which addressed this idea in passing. On page 191 it reads “Each of us lives and works on a small part of the earth's surface, moves in a small circle, and of these acquaintances knows only a few intimately ... Inevitably our opinions cover a bigger space, a longer reach of time, a greater number of things, than we can directly observe. They have, therefore, to be pieced together out of what others have reported” Only eight years later, this small circle has become much larger.



Is it, contrary to a suggested human ability to have a maximum number of connections, that we are collapsing back to an human era of intense collaboration, social hierarchy, and lightning fast information transfer of our cave dwelling hunting/foraging ancestors? Maybe. Sounds and signals as ancient humans cooperated in hunting animals many times their individual size…a twitter like process?





Direction of wind, time of year, layout of terrain, location of animals within the herd, number and capabilities of hunting members…semantic association within the hunter’s mind (in addition to the fact that hunter is here, animals are there)?



What can we learn about how we will interact from where we have been and how we have reported it to each other? You-Tube, Video Jug...the new cave wall?
Thu, April 17, 2008 - 6:21 AM permalink


Websites that promote thin are mentioned in this BBC clip. I typed in “I need to be anorexic” and one of the sponsored links that came up included one site containing the statement “lose 30 pounds in the next 30 days”. The best part, one of the shipping country choices for information about the program includes France.....



The laws with respect to Internet content and such things as privacy, statements denying atrocities are already complex, it will be interesting to see how the collaborative network evolves as questions with respect to jurisdiction of content arise. Perhaps the days of even a more non-uniform network are fast approaching….unless you’re hosting the Olympics.
Wed, April 16, 2008 - 5:40 AM permalink
In a recent ABA news article it was reported that the “University of Chicago Law School has shut down Internet access for most of its classrooms because too many students were surfing the Web instead of taking notes on their laptops.”



Of particular note was the statement that “Soon the students "are going to go out to law firms and other settings where they're going to miss these years where they had opportunities for human interaction and contemplating ideas”



I think law school is great for getting students talking/thinking about social/legal issues among themselves and with professors who can be approached …almost none of the interesting talking/ thinking occurs in the classroom and the students know it. Also, did I miss something, or if students are surfing and not paying attention, BUT are still graduating AND passing the bar exams…if so...then what is relevant/worthwhile about the class or the discussion (human interaction) that students choose not to engage with?





Of course now that the Internet is shut down and policy is being drafted....what do you think is happening now in class? Hmmmmm.....m-2-m text messages, class twitter…and DVDs/video files for killing time. I guess the Chicago Law School administration missed this video about educational institutional space relevance:



Mon, April 14, 2008 - 12:57 PM permalink




Law Technology News recently published an article SOCIAL NETWORKING: Crowded But Silent by a Larry Bodine. The article addresses some of Mr. Bodine’s observations from the recent ABA Techshow and where John Kinas, IT Manager at District of Columbia, is reported to have advised “Online social networks are a poor substitute for in-person networking” as “they are no replacement for meeting a person for coffee or a beer”. This is just plain Bad Advice




Mr. Bodine’s attitude/understanding of online collaboration seems is apparent from the tagline question “What if you gave a party, hundreds of people showed up, but almost nobody talked to each other?” The basis of this question appears to stem from the Science & Technology Law and Young Lawyers Division online survey which he reports showed that 91% of the 2786 respondents spent 25% or less of there time on social network sites. The funny thing is, I have been to hundreds of scientific, technology, and legal themed conferences and have observed that there might be thousands of people there….but no one talks to each other.



What Mr. Bodine, and apparently Mr. Kinas cannot understand (or refuse to) is that SNSs are merely early tools to make more efficient, what is already being done…or not. As Bill Gates stated, “Automation applied to an efficient operation will magnify the efficiency…automation applied to an inefficient operation will magnify the inefficiency” and most face-to-face social situations are not efficient for most attorneys. Narrow views and practice niches are the order of the day in many law firms…the 6 minute billable unit of time and the distillation to the “issues” often prevent attorneys from seeing the social ecology of why the client is calling in the first place. As such, since SNSs and other potentially collaborative sites (online and offline) require a person to engage in the conversation…it is only through conversation that network value can flow….and hence attorneys see little value from online collaboration. Information silo creation, competition, and firm structure often enhance an atmosphere where truly value-added conversation is non-existent.





(Video from "Collaborative Tools: Solutions for Improving Efficiency" conference in Bucharest, Romania held in March 2007.)


BUT NOTE: There is also the role of the current crop of SNSs to consider, most are merely places to post a profile and make “friends, contacts, etc.” You are not going to have a meaningful exchange anymore than going to Starbucks and saying “good morning” to another customer. Simply stated SNSs are horrible at doing what they could do.



The danger of front page articles like Mr. Bodine’s is that they play on a tried and true formula that only enhances lag time for adoption of the concept (not just the specific embodiments). The formula goes something like this: The new thing (where “thing” can be computers, phones, books, theories, or SNSs) will replace what people already do…and here is some examples of the “thing” not working. The underlying message is: using this, devoting resources to this, or talking about this, is a waste of time. It also sends the message that the writer/source is on top of this and should be hired for “consultant work”. I have listened to consultants in the area of “technology”, “rainmaking “ and “software”…they all are long on methods, but short on insight. To quote a non-business source “We have more faith in what we imitate than in what we originate. We cannot derive a sense of absolute certitude from anything which has its roots in us” (ask me for the source if you can’t find it yourself). Fear is masked by method, uncertainty is moderated by protocol (busy work).



What the message should be is: “This “thing” represents a discontinuity in the way things will be done in the next 3-5 years (early examples, innocentive, wikipedia, linux, the dreamliner). Competitive advantage is available to those that understand the discontinuity and are able to effectively integrate it into their current process early. That competitive advantage will allow for a short period of future security…however, the real advantage is the adoption of the flexible institutional mindset which will allow future discontinuities to be adopted efficiently…within a few iterations of that cycling, survivors will be owe their success to the mindset, not the “things”.



It will be interesting to see when the front cover of Law Technology News runs a story on how a SNS like platform is needed as part of the “modern” practice of law. My bet, by April 2012.
Mon, April 14, 2008 - 12:05 PM permalink


OK, just read this article...seems like there would be a MUCH easier solution to this problem of traffic flow recognition. What does almost everyone have in the car when they hit the road? A cell phone...right. Think automatic twitter of GPS location of the phone (in the car) on a platform that users could subscribe to...overlay a map to the updated information...alerts, etc....you could make a really effective network that would provide great information about how fast the cell phones (in cars ahead of you) were going..also thing such as what exits they were stuck on...etc, etc., etc....hmmm some potential goods and services interfaces as well could occur.




How's that for prior art?
Fri, April 11, 2008 - 3:44 PM permalink
originally published at Integrative Semantics
collapse module

My Profile

Gender
Male
Age
44
Location
about me
Attorney at Hatfield Legal Group LLC, a licensed attorney in California and Connecticut; a Registered Patent Attorney with United States Patent and Trademark Office; a former research scientist at Pfizer Inc., and a former Connecticut State Trooper. Have worked for several years in the areas of Alternative Dispute Resolution, Business and Corporate Law and Intellectual Property in both Los Angeles and Connecticut. My practice focuses on marine & ocean based technologies, products, and services.
You are not connected to Thomas
want to grow your network?
view more
collapse module

My del.icio.us List

powered by delicious
collapse module

My Blog

The surf/skate industry is a multi-billion dollar U.S. market player. In fact, based on recent estimates, it is often cited to greatly exceed $6 billion. However, this market size does not surprise even the casual observer who can readily see the significant impact the industry has had on society. For example, the increasing, and often controversial, coastal waterway use by surfers; the creation of new skate parks; the ubiquitous presence of surf/skate inspired apparel; and increase in surf/s... read more
Tue, June 12, 2007 - 5:53 AM permalink - 0 comments
 
view all 1