Reduced to blogging

Finding

   Wed, August 2, 2006 - 11:25 AM
In a field of white clover, there are always a few leaves that don't develop properly. Instead of three palmate leaflets, these mutant leaves have four. They are rare, but not scarce--every field of white clover, every patch, has a few extra lobes. Some children, when told of the malformed leaves, search for them, pouring over each square foot of every patch they see. Days pass. One appears and the kid is wonderfully excited. Nearby, another, and another, and another!! Their newfound success in four-leaf clover hunting has nothing to do with an increase in the number of mutant leaves, but with the formation of a search image in the kid's head--that snap-to-it-gestalt thing the brain can do when an image or feeling or skill is hardwired in. After a few successes, finding them isn't so exciting. Slowly, other skills cover up the search image, remembering car keys and meetings becomes more important, and four-leaf clovers are almost forgotten. Then, if they're lucky, the forgetful one may look down years later and see a four-leaf clover. And another. And another. And another.

To me, finding love is like finding four-leaf clovers. Like finding infrequent but ever-present mutants, it takes a while to develop a search image. If you stop valuing it, you can forget how, and be startled but comforted when it happens again. Ooooh. yeah. I remember what that looks like...



4 Comments

add a comment
Wed, August 2, 2006 - 11:58 AM
Yep.

Hooray for the ubiquitous of mutation!

 
Sat, August 5, 2006 - 3:58 PM
goodness, i'll have to think about that for a while. Image matching is what our neural networks are supposed to excel at. It's a nice metaphor. Due to relatively recent experiences, I am disenchanted with the idea of "falling in love"... but there are many kinds of love, at least 3 according to the Greeks. (phileo, agape, eros, as I recall) I believe that I seek the love that is not attached, in the Buddhist sense.
Mon, August 7, 2006 - 3:22 AM
mr. science! Good to hear from you. Yeah, I'd like to say I'm "disenchanted with falling in love", and, in fact, have been sensibly wary for years. However, as I'm currently in the middle of the fall--somewhere between the confusion of feeling a banana peel slip under my feet and that point where it feels like the ground is so far down as to be unworthy of my attention--I fear such claims would be hypocritical. Somewhere in here, it'd be smart to remember where I stuck those non-attachment wings... and attach them to myself.
Tue, August 8, 2006 - 4:52 PM
One of the frustrating things about the asteroideans of Ketchemack Bay is that they don't read text books. Had they, they would realize that like all good echinodermatae they are supposed to have penteradial symertry---even the wayward holutherans, drifting as they are towards bilateral symetry still have many penteradial traits. However, these Katchemack Bay star fish can often be found with six, yes, six arms, against all laws of their entire phylum.

So, if a creature without so much as a brain can choose to flaunt convention and follow its own path, though somwhat lugubrious, why should we be expected to? Not that I think you should abandon your bilateral symetry and grow another appendage, but i have to say I quite admire the way you seem to move about the mini-biome you have carved out for yourself.

As for the Greeks, once must accept the wisdom of the ancients, but one must accept it for what it is---ancient. Their contribution was a systemic way of looking at the problem, but I certainly don't think they came up with a solution. true the Greeks had three words that can be translated as "love," --- but we have many as well: fondness, adoration, friendliness, affection, devotion, erotic compultion, auto-erotic compultion.... And though they recognized these many types of love, the Greeks were far from being in accord as to what was the most important. Aristotle would say philia---getting really chummy with your buddies. Plato would say eros---but of which type? There is seeing the perfect "form" within the person, and there is also the "heavenly love" that is only possible between a man and a adolescent boy---love between a man and a woman being religated to the "common," or "earthy" love. It is nice to see that they were just confused as we are. I'm all about the confusion.