Please don't read, I was possessed when I wrote this !!!!

cooolsailor — Thu, 06 Apr 2006 08:47:05 GMT

It is only those without wisdom who do not reflect WE DO NOT OWN THE FUTURE OF THIS PLANET, PRESENTLY, WE ARE JUST BORROWING IT FROM OUR CHILDREN!!!!!!!! Every household makes a carbon footprint as large as 3 buses every 10 yrs The most recent deep sea plankton survey revealed that 33% was plastic micron particles (smallest breakdown) and 66% plankton, this is our largest oxygen supply on the planet. Plankton is the bottom of the food chain for our largest food supply on the planet. The oil barons make 90 Billion dollars in 3months, stock marketeers, the medical and car insurance companies figures are unaccountable Nasa spends Billions on space research, to find "extra terrestrial life" while we have a few hundred thousand homeless and jobless and every few seconds a child dies of starvation There are Billions of $$$$$ donated annually, 40% and sometimes more of these funds never reach the poor people it was intended for, instead the rich who run these donation organisations have million dollar launching event parties. In Africa a heapload of money goes to aid, but a large percentage of the food fed to the poor and the under privileged is mostly carbohydrates, and the childrens' brains can not develop properly without a proper protein supply ( how cruel is that ? ) "SHAME ON THOSE WHO PULL THE STRINGS OF THE PUPPETS WE VOTE FOR AND DID NOT VOTE FOR" Please do not think of me as a radical, this is just factual food for thought !!!!!!!!!!!!!!! (teee...........heeee) Well here is a message for all: the poor and the rich, the fair and the unfair, the weak and the strong, the old and the young, the happy and the sad, the controlled and the controllers, the living and........ IF YOU COMPARE THE LENGTH OF YOUR LIFE TO ENDLESS TIME ITSELF (HOWEVER YOU MAY PERCIEVE TIME, THE RELIGIOUS ZEALOTS SEE IT AS THE TIME OF ADAM AND EVE TO THE DAY OF JUDGEMENT, THE SCIENTISTS SEE IT AS FROM ONE BIG BANG TO ANOTHER, BUT IN OUR HEARTS WE KNOW WE CANNOT GAUGE IT, EVER, IT'S RELENTLESS) THUS OUR LIVES IS BUT A BLINK COMPARED TO ALL TIME AND WITHIN THIS BLINK, WE COME IN AS HELPLESS BABES, CANT TALK, CAN'T WALK, URINATE ON OURSELVES, DEFACATE ON OURSELVES ETC AND A BLINK LATER WE DEPART FROM THIS LIFE!!! MORAL OF THE STORY? WHAT MAKES US SUPERIOR TO ANIMALS? THEY HAVE A GENETIC MAKEUP WHICH MAKES THEM FUNCTION WITHIN CERTAIN PARAMETERS (EG A LION IS NOT GOING TO THINK"Oh NO I CAN'T KILL THIS PERSON AND EAT HIM" ) LOL BUT WE AS HUMANS HAVE A WILL TO CHOOSE RIGHT FROM WRONG, YET A LARGE PERCENTAGE OF US WILLINGLY AND CONCIOUSLY MAKE A LOT OF WRONG CHOICES THUS BRINGING US TO OUR BASEST LEVEL OR ANIMAL SIDE, BE IT GREED OR COMPLACENCY ETC AND SOME "LEGALLY" GET AWAY WITH IT AND SOME PAY FOR IT BUT THAT IS PAYING BY MANMADE LAWS ON THE BALANCE OF THE REAL SCALES, HESHE WHO IS MOST CONTENT, IS THE ONE WHO IS FAIR IN HIS/HER DOINGS AND HIS JUDGEMENTS AND HIS/HER DEEDS AND IT IS THOSE WHO WILL HAVE THE MOST VALUE FROM THIS LIFE, REAL PEACE OF MIND AND HE/SHE WHO KNOWINGLY TRANSGRESSES, OBSERVE THEM, THEY ARE ALWAYS IN MENTAL TURMOIL ! Be it freindships , relationships, children or money, you've been entrusted with, it will reflect on you in this "blink" of a lifetime And if anything "does" or "does not" not go your way, whether life treats you good or bad, happy or sad, reflect and in in turn you will gain wisdom So don't forget the poor, and think how you can reduce your carbon footprint, think of yourself, not as just another cog in a large machine, think of yourself as an individual who can make a change where it matters and remember to think out of the box, and to see further than the horizon Plant 50 treest till you blink is over, try and inform at least ten people a day of what you have read today, at least once a day, make an old person happy, help a needy person, make a child smile, fed a hungry person On a last note (this is religious) THINK OF US ALL BEING IN A HUGE BLACK BOX WITH NUMEROUS PINHOLES, WE ALL REACH OUT FOR A LIGHT COMING IN THROUGH DIFFERENT PINHOLES, THE HINDUS CHOOSE ONE LIGHT, THE BUDDISTS CHOOSE ANOTHER, THE jEWS CHOOSE ANOTHER, THE CHRISTIANS CHOOSE ANOTHER, THE MUSLIMS CHOOSE ANOTHER, AND MANY OTHER RELIGIONS CHOOSE ALL DIFFERENT PINHOLES BUT OUR SPIRITUALITY (ALL OF US) IS REACHING FOR THE SAME LIGHT OH READER, BEFORE YOU SLEEP TONIGHT, IN YOUR OWN WAY, PRAY FOR THE POOR AND THE UNBELIEVING, THE PEACE AND HARMONY OF OUR TROUBLE PLANET, AND ASK FORGIVENESS FOR THE ONES WHO DO WRONG, FOR IF WE HAVE NO FORGIVENESS FOR THEM IN OUR HEARTS, HOW CAN WE BE FORGIVEN PEACE MILES DAWOOD A GREAT GREAT GRANDSON OF ADAM PEACE......... MORE FOOD FOR THOUGHT It is universally accepted though incredible to comprehend, light speed is constant for all observers regardless of their speed or direction. Einstein explained that as an object increased in speed, approaching the speed of light, its physical length decreases, its mass increases. So we find a black hole has infinite mass but no size. As the object approaches the speed of light, time slows but the speed of light remains constant. So if he is traveling at 185,999 miles/second, still light is speeding past him at 186,000 miles/second. He will never “break the light barrier” one cannot even approach it. If however he reaches the speed of light, time stops completely Photons and other forms of electromagnetic radiation are timeless, since they travel at light-speed. Since they are timeless, they are everywhere along their path at once. And their path is basically the universe. In other words once a wave is released, it exists everywhere at once. Stated in another way, everything in the universe past, present and future is connected to everything else, in a web of electromagnetic radiation that sees everything at once.” John Gribben, Physcist. It is understood that once you emit any form of radiation, it becomes available to every point in the universe instantly, because while to the observer it takes a very long time to reach whatever the edge of the universe is, the fact is the path that it will traverse, which is in fact the entire universe, as a wave travels everywhere, and since the wave experiences no time whatsoever, it is immediately connected to each and every “corner” of the universe. (how do you think your cellphone works) Duality of Light In 1905 Einstein demonstrated that light has properties characteristic of particles and waves at the same time: the photoelectric effect for which he later received the Nobel prize. Since this time, that dual nature inherent in light has become known as the wave-particle duality. Through the double-slit experiment, in 1803, Thomas Young demonstrated that light passing through a single narrow slit creates a fuzzy image on a screen behind the slit, due to the diffraction of the light wave. If there are two narrow slits in front of the beam, the light produces an interference pattern, such as throwing a stone in the water and as it reaches a bridge with two columns in the water, the waves will move around the columns and coming around the other side, will interact with the waves from the other column, and increase in amplitude where they are moving in the same direction and decrease in amplitude when moving in opposite direction. This was the result of the experience with a stream of light. Now when they used the dual nature of light, to use its particle nature, they shot one particle of light at a time, through these two slits, one at a time, alternating between the two slits. As each sequential photon is fired, one would reasonably expect a fuzzy image to build up, as happened with the one slit experiment. However instead, the typical interference pattern of multiple light and dark bands formed, exactly as if it was a stream of light shot through both slits at the same time. So the particle, basically acted as a beam of a light, which is a wave phenomenon. The issue here is, how did the photon know that the second slit was open or closed? Since each photon was fired sequentially one after the other. However regardless, it acts the same as a wave. This is called “communicating” in the scientific field. E.H. Walker calculated that photons may be conscious. Gary Zukov said, “we have little choice but to acknowledge that photons, which process energy, do process information and act accordingly.” Another experiment, the calcite crystal experiment showed § that this identical phenomena happens not only with photons, but with electrons, protons and even whole atoms act in this way. § What this means is that when an atom is fired through a slit, its behavior will be that of as a wave phenomena. § In one experiment, when they monitored the slit as a particle passed through it, either on one slit or both, say an electron, it passed through the slit as a particle and did not act as a wave. § The particle appeared to “choose” to act as a particle, and not as a wave, before it reached the slit. § In a further modification of the double slit experiment researchers placed a photon detector at one of the two slits. § With a particle detector, physicists again directed the photons, one at a time, towards the two slits. § An unexpected two-band pattern emerged, the individual photon no longer acted like a beam traveling through two slits at once, but instead each photon apparently detected the existence of the detector and went through the slits as a particle and no interference pattern appeared on the screen. § The presence of the detector, logically speaking should not alter the outcome. § The particle “perceived” the detector and as a result remained whole. § Why the presence of the monitors should cause an alteration of the behavior of the photons is unknown. § What forces are at play causing the photons to act prior to reaching the detector. § Consider that the photon has “made the decision” to act as a particle before even reaching the detector. Gerald Schroder “the end of the line for causality. Identical conditions should give identical results. This experiment indicated otherwise.” Gribben, “what you find in such a situation is that each electron is seen to be a particle, traveling through one hole or another. It behaves like a little bullet. And lo and behold, the interference pattern disappears. Instead the pattern on the screen is one of that produced by little bullets, sent through holes independently….crucial moment going thru the hole.” [p. 59 footnote 5] Physicists have coin the phrase “collapse of the wave function” as a description of the change to particle behavior under observation only. Only under observation will a particle fired act as a particle. We find that whether a single detector at one of the 2 slits or 2 detectors at each slit is employed, that the outcome remains the same: it is the presence of any detector, not the number that cause the waves to convert to particles. The resulting conclusion is that the fact of observation profoundly alters the outcome of the experiment. Light remains as a wave without observation, but coalesces to a particle when scrutinized by something tuned to particle phenomena. [summarize for text, put the experiment details in footnotes] The 2nd experiment which demonstrates the “awareness of observation” is when radio waves are used to stimulate Be ions. The waves cause the atoms to jump from ground state, electron level 1 to level 2. By applying the radio impulses for exactly 256 ms. 100% of the ions shifted to level 2. Similarly a burst of 128 ms. Would cause only 50% to make the transition and it is a clear linear relationship between time and number of ions in level 2. The researchers developed a sophisticated technique that allowed them to measure the number of ions in level 1 or level 2. This technique allowed the team to assess the impact of observation without altering the methodology. They shoot the laser device and read how many ions are in level 1. Now if the examiners observed the ions four times over the period of 256 ms of “charging” the ions under the radio frequency, at 64, 128, xxx and 256 ms, only 3/4ths of the ions were found in level 1 at the end of the 256 ms. This means that if one were able to continuously observer the ions, they would in fact never change state. So the act of observing the ions the number of ions going to level 2 is reduced. I.e. they were able to observe the ions continuously they will never reach level 2. John Gribben says: “If it were possible to monitor the ions all the time, they would never change, as quantum theory suggest, the world only exists because it is being observed. The world only changes because it is not being observed all the time.” Thus, a watched pot theoretically never boils. One of the most widely accepted theories is that everything exists in a natural waveform until it is observed. At that time it “collapses” into a particle and the entity transforms into what we recognize as “reality.” As an example, the light we perceive exists in wave form, until it is observed with the eye. Somewhere between the cornea and the brain, the light wave is converted to a particle. (and how fast is that?) n 1930, Einstein, Podolski and Rosen, (EPR) collaborated in a “thought” experiment known as the EPR experiment. They conceived the experiment as an argument against non-locality. Einstein has been an outspoken opponent of this concept as it implied that reality is in fact observer-created. Einstein did not live to see the experiment performed. in 1964, John Bell published the first math proof known as Bell’s Theorem on Bell’s Inequality, verifying non-locality it was not until 1972 that John Clauser conducted the actual scientific EPR experiment as Berkeley. In 1982 Alain Aspect repeated an enhanced version of the experiment. Both experiments verified non-locality. In the experiment, a stimulated particle produces 2 photons. Each travels in opposite directions. As the photons from each pair separate they are observed to be identical in all respects except their direction of travel, including one important quality known as polarization. Polarization is the angle in which the light wave is oriented in space. Thus if one is polarized at zero degrees, so is the other. Clauser and Aspect used this aspect to conduct their analysis of non-locality. In the calcite crystal experiment (mentioned above), the calcite has the property of being able to split a single beam of light into two parallel beams, so instead of two slits, researchers use the calcite to split the beam of light. In this experiment done in 1991 by physicist Martin Sculley photons were shown to behave in one way when observed, and in a different way when not observed. After the photon beam has been split by the calcite crystal, each resultant half was directed via mirrors to a beam splitter which sends half of the light through and reflects half. So the photon is fired, it “splits” into two beams, it hits the beam-splitter, and then from the beam-splitters will be reflected to one detector or pass through the splitter and be received by another detector. It is like a digital switch either reflect or transmit the light. So in theory, with a single photon, it can only either reflect or transmit the photon, but not both. So there is a 50% probability that any photon fired on this path will be reflected or transmitted. The photons were seen to travel in the above manner to either detector one or two, splitting thru the crystal into two “beams” and being reflected through mirrors to the beam splitter. From there the photon would hit either detector one or two, but never to both simultaneously. They appear to configure themselves into the photon’s original configuration, whereby if one half was reflected at the beam splitter the other half was always transmitted. The act of observation was implemented using polarized mirrors, and when a reversing polarizer was placed in front of the detector at the end of the light’s path, the photon acted if is not being monitored. The experiments then modified the experiment to that on one pathway taken by the light, a 90-degree polarizer was placed in the path. By polarizing it 90-degrees, the physicists believed that they could observed the photons, by differentiating them. Inexplicably, this monitoring tactic altered the reconstruction mechanism and the single photon now traveled both paths, triggering both detectors simultaneously. When he placed a reverse polarizer at the end of the light’s path in front of each detector, which cancels the effects of polarization, after the beam splitter, then the photon only triggers one detector or the other. It is this observation that led the researchers to conclude that the photon in fact has detected the change in the observational setup after it has been transmitted, meaning that the photon was made “aware” of the change, and adjusted its behavior after already traversing the circuit. These experiments flabbergasted scientists who read the results, for it showed that photons of light were actually not only conscious of being observed but were conscious of changes in the method of observation after being “fired” from the light source. From such observations, great minds were left stunned. Neils Bohr once remarked, “Those who are not shocked when they first come across quantum theory cannot possibly have understood it.” The difference between the living and the dead From all the above discussion, it is apparent that the act of observation of the angels of the cells and particles of human beings is what “activates” their existence on the plane of the The living has a body and a soul. The dead has a soul but no body. The soul is the “energy” form, or light-body. The primary difference between these two is that the angels have been removed from the body. It is those angels, which are there in any living creature, whose act of observation cause an object to maintain its particle form. Once these angels are removed the observation ceases and the soul is rendered to its energy form and moves freely. That energy, the soul, is still there.

My Blog

Please don't read, I was possessed when I wrote this !!!!