gimme some of that big-box religion

sub-prime bloodletting

   Wed, April 4, 2007 - 9:26 PM
On Monday, you go to the store, and buy a bag of groceries. It costs $50. You get it home, and put some of it in your fridge, some in the cupboard, and some in your stomach. Yum, yum. A few days pass, and as usual, you eat your way through about half the food. On Thursday, the grocer calls you. He informs you that they have decided to change the price of your groceries – see, the price of pork belly futures has gone up, and he has decided to pass the expense off to you. The $50 bag is now going to cost you $200, so you owe the store an additional $150. You can’t believe it. You’re outraged – understandably so. You decide to put it all back in the bag and cart it back to the store. But then you remember, you can’t – you ate half of it. You’re going to have to keep it all, and pay dearly for the privilege.

Welcome to the world of consumer credit.

When you get a credit card, you are purchasing a product. That product is a loan. The terms of the loan are expressed in a contract between you and the bank. I just want to go on record to say, We are out of our minds if we think it’s fine to enter into a financial contract that says that the other party may unilaterally change the terms of the contract in their favor whenever the mood strikes them. And yet, Americans do exactly this thousands of times every day. We’re so used to it that it seems normal.

Sub-prime credit card programs are even worse than standard credit products. Massively powerful financial institutions, such as Cap One, Chase, and Citibank run these scams against the poorest people in our country, first dangling fantasies of dream fulfillment by way of life-enhancing blow-molded petrochemical products, and then grinding these people into the ground of financial ruin.

Here’s how it works. A typical bank credit card scam, run by Chase, Cap One, or other purportedly upstanding major financial institutions, offers people with credit problems a $3000 credit line and reasonable interest rate, such as 9%. But then, when the credit card arrives, it comes with a $250 limit, because, well, based on your income, that’s all you deserve. If this is your first trip into the world where Life Takes Visa, or Everywhere You Want to Be, or Insert Some Other Lame Aspirational Tagline du Jour Here, you may be shocked to discover that the brand-new card carries a starter balance of $198 in sign-up fees, leaving you with a remaining available credit line of just $52. To keep the credit line open, the bank will charge a monthly service fee of $6 to $10. Now, wait a couple months, use the card once for a $50 purchase, and you are over the limit, which triggers a $40-$50 penalty fee. Oops, now you can’t make the full payment, and this goes on for two months, so your interest rate goes up to 30%. It’s all downhill from there, straight to a $3000 debt for your all-American dream of a $50 toaster oven. Or a tank of gas.

When challenged, the banks say that these programs are priced and structured for the high risk market they serve. But if all these people can afford is a $30 per month payment, why are the banks issuing them cards in the first place?

Here are some other examples of Evil Empire credit card policies that should be illegal but aren’t (remember kiddies, credit cards were deregulated 30 years ago, since deregulation would increase competition and benefit consumers… um, yeah):

“Universal Default” – a late payment on a single card can result in high penalty rates in excess of 28% on every credit card you own.

“Two-Cycle Billing” – this is very complicated, but the result is that you will end up paying interest on balances you have already paid. Even worse than the grocery example above.

“Retroactive Price Hikes” – Almost all credit cards have this. You purchase a credit product at a specific rate, and then, later, without your approval, the terms of your agreement with the bank are changed by the bank, often for no apparent reason. To be clear, this can mean that you purchased the credit at a specific rate way back when, and are paying it off, and two years later the bank can change the terms of the deal. This is fucked up.

Most people are surprised by what the banks are getting away with, me included. Finally, I just got fed up with being treated like a bloodletting victim instead of a customer. Last year, when my credit card expired, I didn’t bother activating the new card. I don’t have any problems with my accounts, but I’ll be damned if I’ll let some bank yank me around on the end of a financial chain like that. If I can’t have control over the product I’m buying, I don’t want it.

Consumeraffairs.com

(painting by heike talbert)



22 Comments

add a comment
Wed, April 4, 2007 - 10:09 PM
oh lordissa....
pure evil...

that's about it.
Wed, April 4, 2007 - 11:39 PM
im not surprised anymore.
just broke.

foreclosures are running the housing market these days.
Thu, April 5, 2007 - 1:05 AM
universal default! so that's what it's called. I've been shamed by this very reality. I thought i was smarter, somehow, than to have fallen inside this very labyrinth you describe.

the upside is that I don't buy what I can't afford, I guess.



but I'm still embarrassed to admit it.
Thu, April 5, 2007 - 5:55 AM
Consolidated all our credit cards into a single credit union loan at under 3% interest last year.
Closed all the accounts except for 1 (the emergency account.) Haven't used it. Don't plan on using it. Won't open any new lines of credit.
Thu, April 5, 2007 - 7:27 AM
This is also the lobby that supported the lockdown of Chapter 7 bankruptcy.
Thu, April 5, 2007 - 9:33 AM
I have never had a credit card. Ever.

I do need to get one, though, simply because they won't let you rent a car with a debit card anymore.

I have never had a car loan either. I paid cash. If I can't pay for it at the time, I don't get it. If I want something, I save up.

I'll have to change my ways a bit because we will be looking at houses in the next few years.
Thu, April 5, 2007 - 9:50 AM
> Closed all the accounts except for 1

I've done this over the years, and it barely works. There are accounts I closed in the 80's where I still receive "courtesy" checks, or cards renewed for old girlfriends I haven't seen in years even though I've removed her from the account.

Interestingly, the terms for merchants to accept credit cards are pretty unfavorable. When I owned a retail copy center/graphics store, we paid over 4% on every credit card transaction. That may not sound like much, but we had a volume of about $30,000 each month, with about half paid by credit card. That works out to $600 per month plus static fees. I paid this so their card holders could go further into debt. I could not charge this fee to customers, but I was entitled to offer a "cash discount" which we would do for some large invoices.

I try to buy things with cash such as groceries or other things where the point-of-sale is convenient. But, I've still not found any way around the convenience of using the credit card terminal on a gasoline pump. I'm certain to use the "Credit Card" functionality instead of the "ATM" since that usually means *I* pay no fees. However, I know that the merchant pays fees, and it's reflected in the price I pay for gasoline.
Thu, April 5, 2007 - 12:17 PM
The only reason to have an actual Credit Card these days, is the requirement imposed by car rental companies. Unfortunately, this realization does not occur in most humans until sometime between the 30th & 40th birthdays (if at all).

If one does care to float debt, and has the capability to manage it (I don't), then there are ways to play out the banks' offerings to your best advantage. The downside is that if you falter, they will impose higher rates immediately, which then necessitates paying off the balance or suffer the results of those supercharged new rates. Cards with fixed rates for a specific term, or a variety of bonus points, miles, what-have-you can be beneficial, but if you aren't totally on top of them, its curtains.

Years ago, I had a client who was a loan broker doing what is called "B and C Paper". That is, loans to people with less than stellar credit. He told me one day that he had to quit. He related that often, the terms of such loans were created to insure failure. I frequently remember his words that : "The day you sign the note, you have set its inevitable default in motion." He did leave that company soon thereafter, but the condition still exists and desperate people abound who are foolish enough to take the chance.
Thu, April 5, 2007 - 2:24 PM
"pure evil..."

Yes. This is a perfect example of what I call cannibalistic parasitization. And this is why I put humans in thwir own category. It's like we're too close to it to see it - the primary way that humans survive in this culture is off of the labor, and very life, of others. This is just a vivid and terrible example.
Thu, April 5, 2007 - 2:27 PM
Well, I had written a reply of surpassing cleverness and pathos but Tribe just crashed again and ate it... The following condensed version is provided as an alternative.

Contrarian citizen reports credit cards 'pretty damn convenient'. Vendor is provided payment certainty, easing process. Feature vendorpaid.

Citizen's concern is unsecurity. Credit fraud rampant, doubleplusungood for individuals. Institutions view structure worth this cost. Recommend adding PINs, debitcardwise.

Sub-prime rates separate issue. Present multiways, as in mortgages. Credit cards just plusconvenient rope left for proles to hang themselves with. Verging crimethink.
Thu, April 5, 2007 - 2:30 PM
I thought i was smarter, somehow, than to have fallen inside this very labyrinth...."

I think most people believe this. It's very, very hard to win this game unless you don't really need credit.

It occurs to me that there's something else that's odd about our collective behavior here. I wonder how many people who get a credit card read and understand the contract? I could read it, but I never have - the print is too small, and besides, the actual entire contract doesn't come till after you apply you get the card. The psychological pull of the plastic in your hand is so strong that the idea of reading the contract and deciding to not activate the card would be... challenging for most people.

Even if you had the fortitude, there's another problem with doing this, which is that you would end up with a bunch of credit inquries and lines of credit extended on your credit report, which would *all by itself* lower your credit rating.

Can I just say credit cards SUCK one more time?
Thu, April 5, 2007 - 2:39 PM
"There are accounts I closed in the 80's where I still receive "courtesy" checks, or cards renewed for old girlfriends I haven't seen in years even though I've removed her from the account."

Wow. This makes me very, very happy to be a financially independent person. Even though I was once married for 5 years, and later was in a relationship for ~14, I never commingled my accounts or assets, except for a home mortgage. I like having my own money :-)

On the flipside, I have been heard to whine, "Why doesn't anybody ever want to take care of me?" ...Imagine needing to go to someone for money for something, anything.... how bizarre that would be; how unequal in terms of power balance. The very idea makes me blush and feel anxious.
Thu, April 5, 2007 - 2:40 PM
"is the requirement imposed by car rental companies. "

I wonder if they will accept AMEX.
Thu, April 5, 2007 - 2:43 PM
"This is also the lobby that supported the lockdown of Chapter 7 bankruptcy. "

Yeah. I was thinking about that when I wrote this blog last night. I'd just read an article in Newsweek (I do a lot of reading on planes :-P) about how over 50% of people who file for bankruptcy these days do so because they get cancer and need to pay for treatment, in the hope that it will save their life. The article was quick to point out that these were the people who HAD insurance. Most of the cancer treatments exceed all insurance caps.
Thu, April 5, 2007 - 2:50 PM
Here is the direct quote, from "How I live with cancer", by John Alter.

"During my annus horriblis, Newsweek let me work at home and helped me navigate the insanity of the American health-care system. The claim forms are impenetrable and accompanied by pseudo-sympathetic bill collectors. How do other cancer patients even begin to handle it? Cancer is seriouslty expensive, and no insurance company covers all of it. I met a lymphoma survivor whose wife left him after he sold the house to pay for his transplant. Now he's clinically depressed, too. But at least he's not uninsured or bankrupt. The majority of personal bankruptcies in the United States come from medical expenses, not sloth. In its hideous 2005 bankruptcy "reform", Congress sided with credit card companies and kicked cancer survivors when they were down."

I could cry. In helpless rage.
Thu, April 5, 2007 - 3:05 PM
Gaah! it just ate my clever and unnecessarily detailed response, too.

Citizen shares view behind curtain - proles stand no chance against relentless, emotionally-charged reptilian banks' predatious marketing.

Damn, you're better at blog pseudocode than me.
Thu, April 5, 2007 - 3:53 PM
> Damn, you're better at blog pseudocode than me.

The silly thing is, in 'saving time' doing a briefer rewrite, I got the Newspeak motif into my head and ended up refreshing my memory of it off Wikipedia. Causing me to go back, tweak, etc. So I saved negative time. Brilliant, I know.
Thu, April 5, 2007 - 10:02 PM
oh god.
"over 50% of people who file for bankruptcy these days do so because they get cancer and need to pay for treatment"

Oh shit.
excuse me while I go puke.
This is so fucking depressingly awful.

meanwhile, my good friend- 26 years old, and mother to a two year old just found out she has non-hodgkins lymphoma.

fuck.
Fri, April 6, 2007 - 3:54 PM
That's it. There's nothing "human" about being human anymore. Why would anyone want to be human, when this is how humans live? I'm all through. I no longer identify as a human. I am now a cat. Because I say so.
Fri, April 6, 2007 - 3:57 PM
"That's it. There's nothing "human" about being human anymore. Why would anyone want to be human, when this is how humans live? I'm all through. I no longer identify as a human. I am now a cat. Because I say so. "

Hi, cat. I'm an alien, nice to meet you!

Corporations are reptiles.
Fri, April 6, 2007 - 11:40 PM
I did a quick Google search to verify that 50% cancer/bankruptcy thing, it seemed too extreme. The real stat is still incredibly disheartening, but a bit different:

> "For about half, it's the health-care costs that do
> them in. [...] About 10 percent have the pleasure of
> getting cancer and going bankrupt at the same time."

(from www.msnbc.msn.com/id/752851.../newsweek/ )

It's stunning that such numbers don't help push us to nationalized healthcare. Sickening, in more ways than one...
Sat, April 7, 2007 - 11:19 AM
Lynx, yeah, I garbled the quote from Newsweek, the tried to correct it, above, by inserting the exact quote. Sorry about that.

"It's stunning that such numbers don't help push us to nationalized healthcare. Sickening, in more ways than one..."

I think about this a lot. High quality medical care for all is my #1 campaign issue. My guess on why we can't get nationalized health care is that it's a simple numbers game. At any single point in time, the number of people who are really sick and therefore care about this issue will *always* be a minority. The ones who aren't sick hate to be reminded of serious illness, their mortality, and what *could* happen, plus there's plenty of other disastrous things going on the world....

I like to keep track of what's happening in Massachusetts, where they recently passed a near-univeral health care law.... you can read about it here... it's both heartening and disturbing - for example, there are coercive clauses "Those who fail to get insurance would face penalties that could include the loss of a personal income tax deduction" ... and there is a huge debate over lifetime caps. In a certain light, they make sense to me (the needs of the many outweighing the needs of the few), but in another, it gets uncomfortably close to state-mandated euthanasia....

www.nytimes.com/2007/03/21...21mass.html