Let me know Your thoughts!
French Expert Publicly Emerges to Confirm Secret United Nations Meeting on UFO's
Sun, March 2, 2008 - 7:04 PMwww.federation-airplane.eu/site...e.php
March 1, 2008 at 18:36:04
French Expert Publicly Emerges to Confirm Secret United Nations Meeting on UFO's
by Michael Salla
www.opednews.com/articles/...public.htm
A French aviation expert has come forward to reveal his participation in a secret meeting held at the United Nations New York headquarters that discussed the UFO phenomenon from February 12-14. Gilles Lorant is an attaché to the Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS- National Center for Scientific Research ) which is a government-funded research organization, under the administrative authority of France's Ministry of Research. He is also a member Institute of Advanced Studies for National Defense (IHEDN - the French Organization that produced the 1999 COMETA Report). Both CNRS and IHEDN are prestigious scientific organizations in France, and Lorant was invited to attend the UN meetings in a professional capacity. A report released by a French UFO organization (Federation of European Airplane ), of which Lorant is an executive member, contained a summary of the UN meeting where he describes what happened at the meeting.
Lorant revealed that a series of UN meetings were held over a three day period. In the meetings there was discussion of a confidential report, prepared by the U.S. Air Force and a branch of the National Guard, concerning the societal impact of UFO sightings. The initial meeting was held on February 12 and, according to Lorant’s report, led to a request by three U.S. Senators for further discussions. Additional meetings were held immediately after on February 13 and 14. The implication is that three U.S. Senators attended the secret UN meetings. The meetings were very concerned about social upheaval from continued UFO sightings and the testimonies of individuals claiming to have first hand knowledge about UFO’s, extraterrestrial life, and future global events. It was reported that adverse public reactions to UFO sightings could have a dramatic economic impact that could lead to recessions in some countries.
The emphasis on possible societal upheaval due to growing UFO sightings was reminiscent of recommendations by the 1953 Robertson Panel, convened by the CIA, which identified adverse public reactions as a major security threat that could be exploited by foreign enemies. The UN discussions appeared to match concerns identified in both the 1953 Robertson Panel and the 1961 Brookings Report () to the U.S. Congress, over ramifications of UFO reports and the eventual discovery of extraterrestrial life.
2009 was raised as the year when an important change in official attitudes concerning the UFO phenomenon could be made. This suggested that the official debunking policy underway since the 1953 Robertson Panel would be abandoned and more serious study of the UFO phenomenon would occur. This indicated an important policy shift were the study of UFO’s would be officially encouraged. However, certain global conditions would have to be met for the official opening. Most important appeared to be social stability in G-8 countries and the maintenance of liberal democratic systems in developing nations. Lorant also suggested that an official opening in attitudes would only occur if UFO sightings continued to occur at present levels.
Lorant’s testimony provides independent corroboration for an anonymous source who first came forward on February 12 to reveal to two New York researchers (Clay and Shawn Pickering) that the UN meeting had taken place. The source’s testimony was revealed in two articles published by this author on February 13 and 20 , and a follow up article by Robert Morningstar on Feb 25. Lorant’s testimony gives more detailed information of what happened at the meeting, and is consistent with statements from the original source of the UN meeting concerning approximately 40 participants, multiple issues being discussed as well as the UFO phenomenon, and public reactions to increased UFO sightings. Most importantly, Lorant provides insight into reasons for a significant change in official public policy towards the UFO phenomenon.
The reported results of the UN meetings indicate agreement was reached for an international strategy to more seriously study the UFO phenomenon in a manner that maintains present levels of social stability. *****This raises the possibility that those presenting information on UFOs/extraterrestrial life deemed to threaten national stability or financial systems, would receive special attention by national security agencies.*****(my emphasis! Oannes. - Will those of us who share the views of the Galactic Federation be singled out???) The meetings results suggest that an official change in government policy from ‘debunking’ to ‘openness’ concerning UFO’s would lead to official approval to narrowly define study of the UFO phenomenon. However, those claiming to have first hand experience of extraterrestrial life would be targeted as charlatans. The UN meeting thereby suggested continuation of policies aimed at exploiting divisions in the UFO community between researchers advocating a strictly scientific study of the UFO phenomenon, and those wishing to discuss testimonies/documentation concerning extraterrestrial life visiting Earth. An article exposing "Galactic COINTELPRO" is available here.
Lorant’s testimony finally suggests that governments are being driven to more open approach to the UFO phenomenon due to the recent increase sightings that are projected to continue well into 2009. What follows is a summary report of the UN meetings based on Lorant’s testimony that appears in a newsletter of the FEA and is available in the original French.
[Acknowledgements] I thank Didier de Plaige for his kind assistance in helping confirm background information about Gilles Lorant, and for first revealing on his blogsite details about Lorant who at the time requested anonymity through a mutual acquaintance of de Plaige. I also thank Jean-Luc Bozzoli and Victor Viggiani for their assistance in translating the original French document.
***
Newsletter No. 4 of the F.E.A, 25.02.2008
Posted by Jean-Jacques Yvars …
Dear Friends,
…
For strictly professional reasons and by coincidence, an active member of the FEA was invited to the UN in New York in the week starting February 11, 2008. This person took part in the development of discussions on the subject of UFOs, after the meeting of February 12. These discussions at the United Nations, brought forth further deliberations during three conferences held behind closed doors on 13 and 14 February, to which our member had the honor and pleasure to attend.
Here is a summary of the minutes that Mr. Gilles Lorant, invited to the meetings, kindly shared with us about what was said at the United Nations in New York:
On 12 February, the U.S. Air Force and the National Guard would actually presented a report on the subject of UFOs and the impact of sightings on many communities in the United States. Since this report was considered important for industrialized countries, representatives from several countries were invited to attend. Then, at the request of three United States Senators, a series of three meetings took place in the [two] following days, in the presence of forty representatives from twenty-eight member countries, including the Vatican (two countries did not send representatives). On both days, the subject of UFO’s was discussed, for no more than an hour and a half, as one of the causes of social upheaval of a country, due to the high probability of economic recession resulting from the speeches of ‘contactees’, charlatans, religious [figures], some scientists and prophecies. Sightings of UFOs increase sharply the risk of social unrest threatening the political systems of several emerging democracies.
According to Mr. Gilles Lorant, what was discussed was an opening in official attitudes when publicly considering, in future, how to treat the UFO phenomenon. An official opening to be held under two conditions:
1) Until the end of 2009, that social peace in the G8 countries is guaranteed around the liberal democratic model (US version)
2) By the end of 2009, that the UFO sightings disturbing "our neighbors" continues throughout the world.
Furthermore, also discussed was what position to adopt in case a non-aligned country decided to make public their findings on the [UFO] topic. The atmosphere was rather serious, according to Mr. Lorant, the participants were, in fact, cognizant of the “presence of our neighbors" in our environment.
The suggestion agreed upon at the United Nations by the representatives of the 28 nations, in the course of these exchanges, is of paramount importance for public recognition of the topic. The official treatment of information relating to UFOs could be a turning point at the international level, if the circumstances remain favorable. The coming years could show a surprising development of papers on the subject on the part of our governments.
Dr. Michael Salla is an internationally recognized scholar in international politics, conflict resolution, US foreign policy and the new field of 'exopolitics'. He is author/editor of five books; and held academic appointments in the School of International Service& the Center for Global Peace, American University, Washington DC (1996-2004); the Department of Political Science, Australian National University, Canberra, Australia (1994-96); and the Elliott School of International Affairs, George Washington University, Washington D.C., (2002). He has a Ph.D in Government from the University of Queensland, Australia, and an M.A. in Philosophy from the University of Melbourne, Australia. He has conducted research and fieldwork in the ethnic conflicts in East Timor, Kosovo, Macedonia, and Sri Lanka, and organized peacemaking initiatives involving mid to high level participants from these conflicts.
Sun, March 2, 2008 - 7:04 PM -
permalink -
3 Comments
3 Comments |
add a comment |
|
Sun, March 2, 2008 - 8:54 PM
One more time, without the dashes:
Great post, Oannes! Here's some backround on my views, as well as a response to the article:
I've studied the UFO phenomenon for a LONG time. And when I say "the UFO phenomenon", I mean both the evidence itself AND the social reaction to it. (Too bad I don't work for the government...I could get PAID for this!) I worked with Michael Lindemann here in Santa Barbara beginning in 1995, helping with his ISCNI (Institute for the Study of Contact with Non-human Intelligence) on AOL, when AOL had barely launched. It was the era of the X Files, of the famous "Roswell Alien" film, of Roger Lier's "Alien Implant" operations, of Art Bell, and so on. I was really caught up in this stuff. I went to a weekly "Anomalies" meeting that was made up of MUFON folks and others interested in the subject. I read all the books by Timothy Good (and learned quite a bit about how governments compartmentalize, disseminate, and debunk (mis)information. I read Jacques Vallee's, excellent "Passport to Magonia" and also everything published by Zecharia Sitchin. I spoke with folks who'd claimed to be abductees. I went on a night time UFO seeking camp out with some folks from CSETI. It was all VERY fascinating. I was expecting something to happen, for someone to come forward, for some media conglomerate to give this subject legitimacy...but...surprise! It never happened. I grew frustrated, both at mainstream science's reluctance to even entertain idea of researching this subject and also the increasing flakiness of the folks I kept meeting in the "UFO community". Eventually, realizing that, even though this subject, if legitimate, was certainly THE most significant issue we humans faced as a species, whoever controls the media, whoever pulls our strings, was NOT ready to let this cat out of the bag due to the perceived social upheavals mentioned in the article you posted, Oannes. I mean, Stephen Greer himself had already collected testimony from several credible people retired both from high ranking posts in the military and defense industries, who were willing to testify in front of Congress, for goodness sake...and even THAT wasn't enough to sway any of the "representatives" of our government. Eventually, I drifted away from the subject, became more engrossed in the Graham Hancock/ancient civilization, archaeoastronomy, "precession of the equinoxes" mindset. I've always felt that something about our history, as taught in schools, didn't quite ring true. Not that I feel we've been intentionally lied to, but rather that we've not been told the complete story. And so I've pretty much decided to let the UFO thing rest until either smoking gun evidence came out, or the winds of change blew a little stronger on our planet. So when I read your blog just now, it brought some things back to me. Firstly, the entire UFO question is extremely rich in implications. Here are a few that come to mind: 1. If we ARE being visited by beings, what is their nature? Are they interstellar travelers from the third dimension, or interdimensional travelers from a higher dimension? If the former, you can bet that our governments are VERY interested in figuring out the science behind the FTL drives, for a variety of reasons. Also, you can bet that they are VERY concerned about the economic implications of such drives, as I doubt they utilize fossil fuels. If we were to obtain and learn how to operate such a drive, it would make our current modes of transport obsolete. And scarcity economics is still the only game in town. If oil becomes obsolete, a lot of people stand to lose a lot of money. If they are interdimensional travelers, then all bets are off. Entire religions, as well as entire branches of physics, collapse. Ontologies crumble. And so on. (With a few notable exceptions: on a religious level, the traditions of the East, such as many forms of Buddhism and Hinduism, which already assert a multiplicity of dimensions, populated by a multiplicity of beings, wouldn't be too threatened at all. Likewise with Quantum Physics, which postulates several dimensions other than the one we call home, but hasn't figured out how to travel between them without a phenomenal expenditure of energy...) 2. Based on the above assertions, I think it's rather silly to believe that our "governments" (for lack of a better term) do not already have a VESTED INTEREST in learning everything they can about these beings, their nature, their modes of travel, and especially their motives. It's not that our "governments" won't admit to the reality of UFO's per se, but rather that if they do, they will have to pretend that they haven't ALREADY been studying them at the highest and most secretive levels!!! Nothing threatens control of a society more than an outside force with godlike powers, after all... 3. If "they" are here now, why would we assume that "they" haven't BEEN here from time immemorial? And if that's the case, then we need to ask ourselves to what extent they've been infiltrating, influencing, indeed shaping our civilization. Who's to say that they aren't already running things...which makes this entire UN deal just another step in the aeons long journey to disclosing our true status as either pawns or subjects in the experiment called human civilizaton? Now, don't get me wrong. I am NOT asserting that any of the above is indeed the case. These are just SOME of the broader issues that come to mind when we open this Pandora's box. I look forward to an intelligent discourse here, which, to me, remains in the realm of the speculative until I come face to face with a being from another dimension or star system, or both. It is my most fervent desire for these beings, if they exist, to be highly advanced both in technology and wisdom, and to have our best interests in mind. Frankly, it's hard for me to think that we'll become a Type One civilization without some kinda intervention from a more advanced race. Looks to me like we're doomed to eventually destroy ourselves otherwise... |
|
Mon, March 3, 2008 - 4:10 AM
I think that Extraterrestial or Interdimensional beings regard us as very dangerous monkeys, and would rather not have a lot to do with us until our consciousness is raised several levels. If by some misfortune we were to aquire the abilities to travel interdimensionally, the first thing we would do, would be to kill everyone there, 'cause they'd be different from us, Maybe they'd have something we needed, or they'd believe in something other than our beliefs. Good reasons to kill them. Yep. They know better than to mess with us.
It's not about technology really, it's about Evolution! If we were to Evolve and raise our consciousness, rather than our weapons, we could have it all. The Buddhists, Hindus and Taoists know what they're about. There's only One way forward. "Those who do not go within, Must go Without." |
