<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>Artistic and Simple Nudes's Photo Album</title>
    <link>http://people.tribe.net/figure_study/photos?format=rss</link>
    <description>Tribe.net. Local Connections</description>
    <item>
      <title>19th century nude</title>
      <link>http://people.tribe.net/figure_study/photos/20e1927b-b45e-444f-a3f3-46a592f7a784</link>
      <description>&lt;a href="http://people.tribe.net/figure_study/photos/20e1927b-b45e-444f-a3f3-46a592f7a784"&gt;  						          &lt;img class=" picThumb" src="http://images.tribe.net/tribe/upload/photo/20e/192/20e1927b-b45e-444f-a3f3-46a592f7a784.thumb" width="47" height="78" alt="" /&gt;
    &lt;/a&gt;
							&lt;div&gt;This image is in the public domain. I found it here, on Wikipedia&#xD;
&#xD;
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:19th_century_nude.jpg&#xD;
&#xD;
It is used in this article&#xD;
&#xD;
http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=History_of_erotic_photography&amp;amp;oldid=475897437&#xD;
&#xD;
among others. I'm not sure of why this was used in an article about "Erotic Photography", as this is a fairly low key figure study, but I include the links so that there can be no reasonable questions raised about copyrights, which in the case of this photo would have expired well before the Roosevelt Administration.&lt;/div&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 30 Apr 2012 11:31:54 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">http://people.tribe.net/figure_study/photos/20e1927b-b45e-444f-a3f3-46a592f7a784</guid>
      <dc:creator>figure_study</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2012-04-30T11:31:54Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>



