Re: NASA on crusade to debunk 2012 apocalypse myths
(in ! * POLITICS * !)
See you all in 2013 for the 'I told you so you credulous moron' parties.
discussion post on Wed, November 11, 2009 - 3:07 PM
Re: Nature's IQ - how do Darwinians deal with it?
(in Crossroads of Religion)
What do you think are problematic about any of these?
Bioluminescence has many uses and occurs for different purposes in many deep sea fish, different behaviours in combination with variable behaviours lead to different 'tools'. No mystery ther...
read more
discussion post on Fri, November 6, 2009 - 4:38 PM
Re: are religions stupid?
(in ! * POLITICS * !)
If they were valid, perhaps they'd be worth addressing. The sloganeering accusation is already refuted.
What's absurd is the idea that one should believe anything without reason, without evidence to do so, such a belief is the very definition of ...
read more
discussion post on Thu, November 5, 2009 - 1:43 AM
Re: are religions stupid?
(in ! * POLITICS * !)
If you don't want to be dismissed, pay more attention. The cue is there to go back, re-read - hopefully with better comprehension - and to thereby grasp the point.
Nor is sloganeering going on here. The definition of naive includes a lack of ex...
read more
discussion post on Thu, November 5, 2009 - 12:08 AM
Re: Meaning slips through the fingers of science.
(in Crossroads of Religion)
"How does each bird know to turn at the precise instant the others do?"
Flockign behaviour is actually incredibly simple, each responds to the actions of its neighbours, not the whole flock.
www.aridolan.com/ofiles/JavaFloys.html
discussion post on Wed, November 4, 2009 - 10:38 PM