Writting
spiritual dominance
Fri, April 17, 2009 - 5:58 AMI don't want to embody what I'm criticizing here, and at the same time Its important for me to assert this.
I find the 'break the ego down for you' approach to be very abusive. It is designed specifically to 'wash' people clear, so they can take in the energy of a guru. this presumes that they are filthy as they are, and only the teacher can clean them, and that this person is the best one to fill them back up because they are more divine.
this thread began with coyote sharing HIS OWN guidance, and mr yogi saying 'this is the wrong guidance'. THAT is abusive. it seems subtle, but it essentially communicates that he shouldn't trust himself.
(I, rather than trust themselves 'because they are not ready'.
A child is ready to learn how to trust themselves.
the insidious nature, is that once someone has been 'cleared' in this way, they feel very clearly that they should help others 'clear' in the same fasion. they see the ego game they were subjected to everywhere.
There is some medicine in this, and a lot of misuse. for some people, it may be the best medicine. but it is not designed to elevate everyone. I really want to make that clear. yogi maden even said it, he's only searching for the select few..., (despite having 34534r friends). these few are 'elevated' in a paradigm that needs peons. that is what happened in India.
I am grateful, deeply grateful, for the gifts of yoga. and I'm also aware that it has been, for millenia, an elite practice of a caste system that KEPT the lower classes down, at all costs. they were not allowed to be anything other than the lower classes, by birth. and they played the role of feeding the upper classes their spiritual energy.
as the practices comes to america, we have the opportunity to be part of a transformation, where their wisdoms and gifts of learning to feel, to balance, to breathe, and to explore both physically and spiritually are freed to the world, and we discard the klipatch, the husk, the patterns of dominance that were perhaps necessary to keep the fire burning through ages where culture could not afford to support many people who didn't work to create shelter and food.... but are not relevant to our present age.
Now is different. we are more in touch with our eternal selves. we can draw on ancient wisdom easily and naturally. most of us are highly literate, and we have it available to create a world without war.
we begin, by removing the need to dominate each other. knowledge is never more important than love.
learn, accept teachers. but do not surrender personal divine guidance as the ultimate root. teachers are part of divinity, and each of us is always divine.
the same balance on excess, the same stability that highly revered teachers provide, can be replaced by something much more dynamic and fun. spiriutal collaboration. we balance eeach other.
thje only prerequisite for participating at the lowest and highest levels, is that we honor and respect the divinity already present in everyone. no level of consciousness can be embodied that exempts any of us from being humbled by a child, or a bird.
Fri, April 17, 2009 - 5:58 AM -
permalink -
3 Comments
3 Comments |
add a comment |
|
Fri, April 17, 2009 - 7:24 AM
i just finished watching teabagging protests across the country and then reading this ... not sure we've come quite as far as you think - at least not the majority. In so many cases we each now speak to our respectives choirs only. Most first world humans are thoroughly lost in our materialist culture - i mean thoroughly!
|
|
Wed, April 29, 2009 - 7:59 PM
Lovely
I especially liked your last line: "no level of consciousness can be embodied that exempts any of us from being humbled by a child, or a bird."
From my perspective, when the original idea of subduing the ego was formed, the goal was not to empty the ego and let in a guru. The goal was to subdue one's pride and sense of individuality in order to realize that beneath our individual ideas of self is a deeper connection with the divine that connects us all...that connection of course being love itself. I don't think that trust in one's self and trust in the song that binds to the river is mutually exclusive when it comes to subduing the ego. "Destroying" the ego is destroying the static that our culture tends to encourage us to create. That static is like a white noise that renders the self literally "static." Its made up of all the idiotic ideas of self that are really too one dimensional and limited to define the soul in all of its multi-faceted brilliance. ie: "I am a lawyer." "I have a doctorate." "I weigh 103 lbs." "I am an American." and extends to things we own. "I drive a Beamer." "I have a pretty wife." "My children go to an elite private school." Destroying the ego means destroying the labels we have tried to brand ourselves with so that we may see ourselves as...custodians of our environment before we see ourselves as Americans, and etc. This facet of the ego, while benign in and of itself, can be dangerous in the same way that most addictive drugs are fundamentally dangerous: They prevent us from growing and changing and keep us suspended in a state of fear and clinging. "Destroying" (I prefer the word subduing) the ego It is as simple as that and I still think its a healthy thing, a lot less mystical than many would have it, a lot more difficult than many would think it too :) |
