I will add parts of the letter that I am referring to at the end..
Letters to the Editor for Wednesday, December 12, 2007
Love is a word with many definitions
Editor:
In response to David Bowerman's December 8 letter, "Church shouldn't encourage sinners," I would like to say first that I am glad he is seemingly a loving Christian. We do need to love everyone, whether we agree with what they are doing with their life or not.
However, for someone to say that you should "warn others strongly" is, in my opinion, another way of saying that you are trying to convert them to your interpretation of the Bible or trying to change them.
You are not going to make a gay person all of a sudden become straight, just as you could not make a straight person become gay. It just does not work that way, even with the fear of eternal damnation. If you fear they are wrong, and you are a good Christian, then I would think that all you need to do is pray for them.
Love is one of those words that has many definitions. To speak the truth in love, as Bowerman put it, would be something that, based on each individual's definition of love, would be their own personal truth. With that said, each person would then be correct if they base their truth on their definition of love.
Maybe, just maybe, the gay person that Bowerman's letter was referring to is speaking their truth in love.
Live and let live.
Angie
Parts of the letter that I referred to:
Church shouldn't encourage sinners
Editor:
I'm writing in response to Marty (???) Senior Pastor of St. Paul's United Church of Christ, who wrote that he believes that Bible verses condemning homosexuality are taken out of context and that it's OK to be gay and call yourself a Christian, even calling on the church be tolerant of gays or risk future splits.
Let's test his claim. Everyone is familiar with the Old Covenant's stand calling homosexual sex an "abomination," but what does the New Covenant that Jesus established say about it? 1 Cor 6:9-11 is one very clear statement that speaks for itself, "Do you not know that the wicked will not inherit the kingdom of God? Do not be deceived: Neither the sexually immoral nor idolaters nor adulterers nor male prostitutes nor homosexual offenders nor thieves nor the greedy nor drunkards nor slanderers nor swindlers will inherit the kingdom of God. And that is what some of you were. But you were washed, you were sanctified, you were justified in the name of the Lord Jesus Christ and by the Spirit of our God."
If that's not sufficient, read Romans 1:26-28.
Is there any doubt about the context of that Scripture? None that I can see. Kuchma tries to twist Scripture to persuade us that homosexual sex is OK, but it's not. God still calls it sin and tells us that those who refuse to repent from it will not inherit eternal life in Heaven. If I were Kuchma, I'd be very worried about Isaiah's warning "Woe to those who call evil good."
Kuchma argues that it's not loving to speak or write this way, that it hurts feelings and wounds. I agree that we need to love everyone, gays included, and must never use sexual orientation as an excuse to harm anyone. But if you truly love someone that you believe is on a path to Hell, shouldn't you warn them strongly? Isn't that speaking the truth in love? God's will is for no one to perish, but all have eternal life in Christ Jesus. But to embrace Christ, we have to first surrender our lives to Him and allow Him to make us into a new creation.
Wed, December 12, 2007 - 3:45 PM
permalink
Letters to the Editor for Wednesday, December 12, 2007
Love is a word with many definitions
Editor:
In response to David Bowerman's December 8 letter, "Church shouldn't encourage sinners," I would like to say first that I am glad he is seemingly a loving Christian. We do need to love everyone, whether we agree with what they are doing with their life or not.
However, for someone to say that you should "warn others strongly" is, in my opinion, another way of saying that you are trying to convert them to your interpretation of the Bible or trying to change them.
You are not going to make a gay person all of a sudden become straight, just as you could not make a straight person become gay. It just does not work that way, even with the fear of eternal damnation. If you fear they are wrong, and you are a good Christian, then I would think that all you need to do is pray for them.
Love is one of those words that has many definitions. To speak the truth in love, as Bowerman put it, would be something that, based on each individual's definition of love, would be their own personal truth. With that said, each person would then be correct if they base their truth on their definition of love.
Maybe, just maybe, the gay person that Bowerman's letter was referring to is speaking their truth in love.
Live and let live.
Angie
Parts of the letter that I referred to:
Church shouldn't encourage sinners
Editor:
I'm writing in response to Marty (???) Senior Pastor of St. Paul's United Church of Christ, who wrote that he believes that Bible verses condemning homosexuality are taken out of context and that it's OK to be gay and call yourself a Christian, even calling on the church be tolerant of gays or risk future splits.
Let's test his claim. Everyone is familiar with the Old Covenant's stand calling homosexual sex an "abomination," but what does the New Covenant that Jesus established say about it? 1 Cor 6:9-11 is one very clear statement that speaks for itself, "Do you not know that the wicked will not inherit the kingdom of God? Do not be deceived: Neither the sexually immoral nor idolaters nor adulterers nor male prostitutes nor homosexual offenders nor thieves nor the greedy nor drunkards nor slanderers nor swindlers will inherit the kingdom of God. And that is what some of you were. But you were washed, you were sanctified, you were justified in the name of the Lord Jesus Christ and by the Spirit of our God."
If that's not sufficient, read Romans 1:26-28.
Is there any doubt about the context of that Scripture? None that I can see. Kuchma tries to twist Scripture to persuade us that homosexual sex is OK, but it's not. God still calls it sin and tells us that those who refuse to repent from it will not inherit eternal life in Heaven. If I were Kuchma, I'd be very worried about Isaiah's warning "Woe to those who call evil good."
Kuchma argues that it's not loving to speak or write this way, that it hurts feelings and wounds. I agree that we need to love everyone, gays included, and must never use sexual orientation as an excuse to harm anyone. But if you truly love someone that you believe is on a path to Hell, shouldn't you warn them strongly? Isn't that speaking the truth in love? God's will is for no one to perish, but all have eternal life in Christ Jesus. But to embrace Christ, we have to first surrender our lives to Him and allow Him to make us into a new creation.
