collapse module

Ovenette

offline 152 friends
joined on 02/05/05
last updated 05/14/08
collapse module

bloggity-blog-log entries

"I think younger workers—first of all, younger workers have been promised benefits the government—promises that have been promised, benefits that we can't keep. That's just the way it is."—Washington, D.C., May 4, 2005

with the recent appraisal of our country's economic fitness, I'd like some options, alternatives for retirement. anyone?? where to go...

there's no way I'm staying in this country another ten years even. this is really getting serious. as of Jan 1, 2008, our baby-boomer... read more
Fri, March 21, 2008 - 7:55 PM permalink - 1 comment
 
During the latest environmental crisis I've grown a certain fondness for the paper towel. It has long been a commodity, a prominent member of the paper product family, that I have grown to trust and admire for its functional durability and selfless disposability. Over the years I've come to rely on the towel for my everyday household needs. Its strength and light-weight portability makes it so convenient for transport on long trips. I often carry along a few of them, moistened, in a Ziplocs... read more
Tue, February 26, 2008 - 11:42 AM permalink - 2 comments
 
"A lot of times in the rhetoric, people forget the facts. And the facts are that thousands of small businesses—Hispanically owned or otherwise—pay taxes at the highest marginal rate."—to the Hispanic Chamber of Commerce; Washington, D.C., March 19, 2001
George W. Bush
Tue, October 9, 2007 - 7:57 PM permalink - 7 comments
 
...Two men raised an orphan lion cub, but they raised it with the intention of releasing it back into the wilds. So they did their best to not just feed and take care of it, but to teach it to hunt like it's mother would have. When the lion got big enough, it was let go deep in the savannah and left to fend for itself.

Later the two young men started to wonder if the lion they had released had survived or not, and because of the deep personal attachment they had to it they hired a tracke... read more
Mon, October 8, 2007 - 6:49 PM permalink - 2 comments
 
My date with Gavin Newsom and the greater part of an evening in San Francisco

Thu, October 4, 2007 - 4:29 PM
The lucky caller of Ruby Rod's 98.7 KISS fm radio contest last week, Gavin 10-10 Newsom, a modest gentleman and Mayor of San Francisco, won a date with me for a romantic escape throughout the city, a fundraising endeavor supporting my favorite local charities and humanitarian efforts. And it was quite a dating adventure. I have to admit.

Originally, Mr. Newsom, or as he ... read more
Thu, October 4, 2007 - 4:29 PM permalink - 2 comments
 
Thanksgiving Prayer
"To Jack Dillinger and hope he is still alive.
Thanksgiving Day November 28 1986"


Thanks for the wild turkey and
the passenger pigeons,
destined to be shit out
through wholesome American guts.


Thanks for a continent to despoil
and poison.

Thanks for Indians to provide a
modicum of challenge and
danger.

Thanks for vast herds of bison to
kill and skin leaving the
carcasses to rot.

Thanks for bounties on wolves
and coyotes.

Th... read more
Wed, September 19, 2007 - 11:51 PM permalink - 1 comment
 
view all 89
collapse module

the name is katrina

about me
yes
You are not connected to Ovenette
want to grow your network?
view more
collapse module

peanuts

February 19, 2006
I feel compelled to add to what I said earlier, which I believe failed to capture the essence. Katrina is at a libration point, equipoised between body, mind and spirit. She seeks and is able to provide to other beings all these things: physical pleasure, intellectual depth (with an emphasis on aesthetic critical analysis), and a quest for something more. She is a seeker. And a giver of joy.
February 5, 2006
A great sage, Curious Jim (may he rest in peace), once said, " Katrina is not just a pretty face. She's wicked smart and some kind of freaky art savant. The complete package."

I would humbly add that while Katrina has a deep appreciation of art and history and such, qualities that cannot be gainsaid, what she truly excels at is being the cat's pajamas! I would like to perch on her shoulder, recite Pliny, and gently nibble on her earlobe.
Unsu...
 
January 5, 2006
Katrina is not just a pretty face. She's wicked smart and some kind of freaky art savant. The complete package.
Unsu...
 
December 23, 2005
Haven't met this enigma wrapped in a conundrum wrapped in a nice flaky pastry...but I wanna. Her brain is just so goddam sexy...I want to mate with it and make little gray baby brains, with English accents.
October 25, 2005
I think she's kinda funny.
view all 5
collapse module

Frederick's blog

America is a rhetorical republic. Our people are united not by ethnicity, institutions, territory, nor even, as is becoming evident, language, but rather by narrative – specifically, epic narrative; more specifically, Biblical epic; and more specifically still, America identifies itself nationally in terms of the grand Biblical epic of Exodus. To be sure, others have appealed to Exodus – the Voortrekkers of 19th century South Africa and the civil rights marchers of 20th century America are two neatly opposed instances – but no other great nation has modeled itself on the migration led by Moses from Egyptian servitude across the desert to the Promised Land. If Exodus tells us who we are in general terms, the Jeremiad reminds us of certain particulars. It seeks to make us aware, and even establish as the central theme of the story, that the journey is dangerous, and that we will prevail under such harsh conditions only through absolute unity and individual self-sacrifice. It reassures us that our ideals are high – that God is on our side – but also warns that any loss of faith in them – any doubt that reliance on God alone is enough to ensure our delivery to Canaan – will be severely punished. Indeed, the journey to freedom is a test of our basic beliefs, and we will be singled out for extraordinary punishment if we waver from them. Special care must therefore be taken to identify, castigate, and ostracize backsliders and others who are less than unreservedly enthusiastic about the mission. President George W. Bush and his administration have followed this narrative closely. September 11th threatened a new form of Egyptian servitude, and a trek into the desert (Afghanistan, then Iraq) was duly instigated to protect our freedom. Indeed, Bush turned out to mimic Moses in a great many details. Like Moses, Bush is prickly, defensive, and a poor speaker. Though Moses had only one brother, Aaron, to correct his garbled speech, Bush relies on a whole band of brothers – and a sister, if one adds Condoleezza Rice to Donald H. Rumsfeld, Richard V. Cheney, and Colin Powell. Moses gave his people the Ten Commandments, and Bush saw to it that the Patriot Act was brought down to Americans from the Hill, if not the Mountain. In tune with the Jeremiad, he regularly warns of the hazards that threaten and the monsters that lurk, and even supplemented his sermons with the more user-friendly color-coded Threat Level System of Homeland Security, which gets turned up or down in accordance with the administration’s desire for unity and discipline (as I write, the level is yellow, for “elevated,” like one's blood pressure). He loves nothing more than to mean-spiritedly hector those with the temerity to express skepticism about the wisdom of his advenure. But in Bush’s case, there is more to all this than mere analogy. Scholars such as Sacvan Bercovitch and Perry Miller have pointed out the way in which the Puritan Jeremiad was transformed and secularized as a central public mode of political address in America. Faith in God became fidelity to America's founding principles, and criticism took the form of attributing the nation's ills to a failure to live up to our political ideals coupled with a call to renew our commitment to them. With Bush, however, secularization doesn’t enter in. Literally like Moses, not just metaphorically, Bush hears God instructing him on policy and leadership, to the apparent awe and delight of his constituents. Bush literally believes that he has been called by God to lead his people through the wilderness to the land of milk and honey, though in this version Bush marches the faithful back to the Holy Lands for the migration to end all migrations, the “end-time” of Armageddon. The Jeremiad provides one explanation for Bush’s inability to express disappointment with the way things are turning out in Iraq. According to the Exodus-Jeremiad logic, the worse one’s suffering in the desert, the more certain one can be of God’s interest in one’s project. The hardships are provided by God expressly to test the missionaries’ faith in Him. An easy victory, in fact, would have been a disturbing indication that God was not really interested in Bush’s war. From the point of view of Bush’s fundamentalism, his horrendous record of defeat in Iraq not only offers welcome opportunities to demonstrate his and his people’s faith in their God in the face of powerful evidence that He has in fact abandoned them, but also provides confirmation that what Bush takes to be God’s voice is indeed His. The policy implication is that nothing is going to convince Bush to change course. In his heart of hearts, he truly believes: the worse, the better.
Mon, May 22, 2006 - 5:24 PM permalink
It occurred when Clinton, on January 17, 1998, in the course of his grand jury testimony for Kenneth W. Starr’s expanded Whitewater investigation, said: “It depends on what the meaning of the word ‘is’ is.” He was answering a question as to whether he wasn’t lying when, earlier, he assured one of his top aids that “there’s nothing going on between us,” i.e., Clinton and erstwhile White House intern Monica Lewinsky, or when he told PBS newscaster Jim Lehrer that “there is no improper relationship” between Lewinsky and him. Now, logicians distinguish three "modes" of the word “is”: the existential, the predicative, and the “is” of identity. One can say of something that it is in the sense that it exists, such as when the believer asserts that “God is” (existential). Or one can say of something that it possesses a certain property, as when the geologist states that a particular rock is reddish, light, and porous (predicative). Finally, one can say of something that it is the same as x, as when the astronomer says that Venus is the morning star or Lois Lane says that Clark Kent is Superman (identity). But these distinctions are not what Clinton had in mind. He was concerned with the grammar of “is,” specifically its indication of the present tense and the fact that since, by the time he made his statements about Lewinsky, their sexual relationship had ended, what he said, given that it referred to the present, was strictly true. Clearly, Clinton did not say: “There was no improper relationship.” He even went so far as to implicitly admit that “if 'is' means is and never has been,” then he had lied. But, of course, as a matter of grammar, “is” doesn’t behave that way. Whether considered as simple present, active or passive, or present progressive, active or passive, Clinton’s denial that there “is” an improper relationship was, when he issued it, by all accounts true. Even though what mattered to Clinton, so far as “is” was concerned, was grammar not modality, it’s nonetheless worth noting that the mode of “is” in question was existential. The issue was whether a sexual relationship between Lewinsky and Clinton is, whether such a relationship exists or is non-existent and by extension the question of what it means that things are, that there is something rather than nothing. And that is precisely the question that Heidegger attempts to re-assert beginning with "Sein und Zeit" (1927): the question of the meaning of being, the significance of the fact, which is more than one fact among others, that quite apart from their properties and identities, their characteristics and behavior, their origins, causes, effects, and purposes, their structures and functions, things just are. True, Clinton raised the issue in a regrettably tawdry context, and neglected to develop it very far, but he did raise it. It is to be hoped that, among the projects of Clinton’s presidential library, some consideration is being given to furthering his legacy as a thinker of the relationship between being, or isness, and language by supporting further inquiry into these questions.
Wed, March 29, 2006 - 1:34 AM permalink
MySpace.com is a web-based communications network featuring software tools that enable its members to create “profiles” of themselves, that is, public personae, not only in the form of verbal information but also by means of a variety of expressive media such as digital images, video, and music. Indeed, the sheer act of presenting (or representing) oneself is a central activity of MySpace members. In addition to profiling themselves, however, members may also attract other members, who become their “friends,” and contact friends already in their network. Contact takes the form of posting commentary and testimonia on profiles (which are retained or deleted at the profiler’s discretion), which may then be commented on in turn by the profiler or others. The effect is to bring into being a “community” – if that is the right term – that is powerfully centered on individuals and their performance, through the expressive media available to them, of their own personalities. There is nothing necessarily “confessional” about this, though the occasional confession may take place; the atmosphere is more akin to the theatrical: what matters are the style, the stance, the intensity, and attraction of the personalities who appear to one another. Because the performances of their identities are “witnessed,” albeit virtually, by others, the question of who one is has as much to do with the opinions of others as with the raw data of one’s own profile. Seeing and being seen, in other words, or what the social interaction design theorist Adrian Chan characterizes as “presence” – presence constituted through the participation of witnesses who form judgments and comment on what they see – is what matters. What sort of a “space” is MySpace, then? Some have pointed out that it is not a public space, because the kind of talk that goes on in it is anything but rational deliberation aimed at reaching a consensus on a matter of common concern. (When I asked my 16-year-old daughter whether anyone on MySpace discussed politics, she looked at me in silence but with an expression of grave concern for my mental well-being.) But this is to invoke an overly narrow conception of public space and its value. For a more expansive perspective, we can turn to the insights of Hannah Arendt, one of the few truly original political philosophers of the last century. For her, the point of establishing a public space is to enable the experience of freedom and the appearance of individual distinction. Freedom – that is, spontaneous, creative, unscripted activity in speech or deed – is possible to the extent that purely instrumental enterprises, activities that are valuable and meaningful only because they contribute to the achievement of a pre-established goal, are excluded. That exclusion is in large part what constitutes a public space. The participants in a public space come together for the sheer intrinsic pleasure of interacting with one another – seeing and being seen. Since nobody is in charge, there are neither leaders nor followers, but only peers who are at the same time actors and who might, if they are sufficiently impressive, become leaders of a sort and for a time. What matters here is the quality of an actor’s performance, above all his performance of his identity. That, of course, is a matter of taste, an aesthetic judgment, and Arendt insisted that the kind of commentary appropriate to what goes on in public is closer to literary criticism – how does this or that strike us, what does it mean? – than to the application of universal principles in accordance with the rules of rational argumentation. To a great extent, this is the world of MySpace. Undoubtedly, there are many members who are more concerned with blending in than standing out, and so have little interest in what Arendt characterized as the “fiercely agonal spirit” that dominated what was for her the exemplary public space of the ancient Athenian polis. Nevertheless, agonism is very much on offer in the drive towards self-display, to distinguish oneself from others, to be noticed, to attract an audience, and to do so, again, in freedom – in a non-regulated environment where the only authority is that constituted momentarily by the expressed judgments of witnesses, such that whatever consensus might temporarily be achieved could be undermined at any time by the introduction of a fresh point of view. As the digital communications theorist Danah Boyd has pointed out, it is no accident that it is young people, primarily teenagers, who have flocked to MySpace. Of course, they call what they do there “hanging out” and being “cool,” not the enactment of freedom. But perhaps they should. Their lives are, after all, profoundly characterized by the two elements that Arendt found most inimical to freedom: subjection to an external, undebatable goal, and regulation by means of rulership and rules. From school to home, this picture changes very little for today’s teenagers, for whom the steady parental and political drumbeat to organize their entire lives according to the imperative of enhancing their future marketability must be very close to unbearable. Readers of Arendt, however, will no doubt be thinking at this point that Arendt herself was adamant that children must be protected from the potential calamities of the public sphere and its freedom. The public sphere is, she pointed out, essentially anarchic, because no one can predict or control the consequences of what is said and done there. Who one is as a public figure depends on reputation, and a reputation can go overnight from good to bad. Adults can decide to take on the risks of appearing in public, but children need a stabler, safer, more predictable world. If it were only a matter of reputation, we might be inclined to regard Arendt’s views on children as merely quaint. Today’s teenagers cannot avoid an education in freedom – that is, in imagination and spontaneity – for nothing less will equip them with the spiritual resources to find meaning in a cold and lonely society (certainly not Creationism or Intelligent Design). But as the news media and politicians have lately insisted, there are other dangers that come along with the freedom of expression and communication provided by sites like MySpace – though it is also clear that these dangers have been hysterically exaggerated. Education, awareness, and forms of accountability are clearly in order. But it would be a travesty if, in the name of safety and security, measures were taken to suppress the very features by means of which MySpace shelters freedom for self-assertion and self-development for a generation badly in need of it.
Sat, March 11, 2006 - 7:17 PM permalink
Last year saw the publication of Harry G. Frankfurt’s "On Bullshit" (Princeton, 2005), a tongue-in-cheek but sincere effort to articulate the concept of bullshit. Since then some spinoffs have appeared, such as Laura Penny’s "Your Call Is Important to Us" (Crown, 2005) and "Why Business People Speak Like Idiots" by Brian Fugere, Chelsea Hardaway, and Jon Warshawsky (Free Press, 2005). As these titles suggest, the focus is on bullshit that originates in the officeplace rather than the world of politics, which is unexpected to those of us for whom George Orwell’s "Politics and the English Language" (1946) is the canonical study of the subject, but is also perhaps telling. I’m troubled by this zeal to identify bullshit because it seems to me that there probably is nothing other than bullshit. Frankfurt defines bullshit as pretending that you know what you’re talking about when in fact you don’t. But that strikes me as a good description of human communication as such. Compassion dictates that one appear confident in what one is saying. Every parent learns this early on; nothing is more terrifying to young children than the idea that they are being cared for by people who don’t really know what life is about. So one learns to mime the self-confidence that is demanded. But the rule holds for all ages. Uncertainty is disturbing, and we love to hear from those who convincingly ape a command of relevant facts and concepts. It’s all a mere mummer’s play, but we couldn’t do without it. That the answer to “Is There Anything Besides Bullshit?” is “No” captures something important in the position expressed by the early Wittgenstein in his "Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus" (1927), which held that what matters can’t be put into words, and that what can be put into words doesn’t matter. On this view, any verbal performance that is more ambitious than the sheer stating of fact (“such-and-such is the case”) is bullshit. But – is it possible not to go beyond the facts? Doesn’t the assertion of even a purely factual statement imply a judgment that these facts and not others that might be mentioned are significant from one or another point of view? Indeed, isn't everything that we think of as “culture” and “science” and “scholarship” and “expert opinion” a matter of going beyond the facts – generalizing, inferring, postulating? Modern physics would be bullshit, on this view, to say nothing of religion, law, literature, and social science (which most of us are already prepared to acknowledge are bullshit). To find our way in this imbroglio, we would have to define “bullshit” more carefully. It is true that everything we (really want to) say is bullshit. But not all bullshit is equal. Some bullshit goes beyond the facts in ways that are benign, and even beneficial. In these worlds, there is an ongoing contest among bullshits as to which we will accept and which we will abandon at any given moment. Here, we can even admire extraordinary bullshit artists without in any way being convinced that their bullshit is true. There is a place for such bullshitters in this world. Other bullshit goes beyond the facts in an insidious way: by making it appear that its inferences and postulates and generalizations possess the force of facts. So, to answer the question: No, there is nothing besides bullshit, but some kinds of bullshit are worse than others, and a great deal is at stake in exposing the worst as such. On the other hand, a great deal is also at stake in recognizing the way in which, despite the difference among bullshits, everything we say is, in the end, bullshit. At a time when more and more people seem all too ready to believe that some talk is not bullshit – that some talk, for example, is the unalloyed word of (their) god – this is this lesson that seems especially urgent to learn. At the same time, however, the significant minority of relativists need to be reminded that some bullshit is deadlier than the rest, and that their very commitment to relativism enjoins them to identify this bullshit and heap scorn upon it. On the other hand, one might say that the very idea that there is good bullshit and bad bullshit is itself bullshit.
Wed, March 1, 2006 - 8:34 PM permalink
All readers of Vladimir Nabokov are astonished by his extraordinary ear for American speech in all its varieties. In "Lolita," though, there is what appears to be a curious anomaly. On two or three occasions, Humbert Humbert informs us that he stopped at a “candy bar” to purchase sweets for Lolita. So far as I know, a candy bar is something you eat, not a place to buy candy. Is this is a slip on Nabokov’s part? In a sense, it’s impossible to say, because Humbert is the narrator and the slip might just as well (or even more plausibly) be attributed to him. Or perhaps it isn’t a slip – perhaps there are or were such places as candy bars. But it’s a usage I’ve never encountered.
Sun, February 26, 2006 - 4:40 PM permalink
originally published at My Blog
expand module

Dreaming-Bear Blog

expand module

Edward's brain dump

expand module

Deep Thoughts by Jack Handy

collapse module

just a few

"The Senate needs to leave enough money in the proposed budget to not only reduce all marginal rates, but to eliminate the death tax, so that people who build up assets are able to transfer them from one generation to the next, regardless of a person's race."—Washington, D.C., April 5, 2001

"I've coined new words, like, misunderstanding and Hispanically."—Radio-Television Correspondents Association dinner, Washington, D.C., March 29, 2001

"A lot of times in the rhetoric, people forget the facts. And the facts are that thousands of small businesses—Hispanically owned or otherwise—pay taxes at the highest marginal rate."—to the Hispanic Chamber of Commerce; Washington, D.C., March 19, 2001

"Then I went for a run with the other dog and just walked. And I started thinking about a lot of things. I was able to—I can't remember what it was. Oh, the inaugural speech, started thinking through that."—Pre-inaugural interview with U.S. News & World Report, Jan. 22, 2001 issue

"I want it to be said that the Bush administration was a results-oriented administration, because I believe the results of focusing our attention and energy on teaching children to read and having an education system that's responsive to the child and to the parents, as opposed to mired in a system that refuses to change, will make America what we want it to be—a literate country and a hopefuller country."—Washington, D.C., Jan. 11, 2001

"Natural gas is hemispheric. I like to call it hemispheric in nature because it is a product that we can find in our neighborhoods."—Austin, Texas, Dec. 20, 2000

"The legislature's job is to write law. It's the executive branch's job to interpret law."—Austin, Texas, Nov. 22, 2000

"They misunderestimated me."—Bentonville, Ark., Nov. 6, 2000


bushisms The president's accidental wit and wisdom.

The Complete Bushisms
Updated frequently.
By Jacob Weisberg
Updated Friday, Dec. 23, 2005, at 11:41 AM ET

"If you found somebody that had information about an attack on America, you'd want to know as best as we can to find out what the facts are."—Philadelphia, Pa., Dec. 12, 2005

"I think we are welcomed. But it was not a peaceful welcome."—Philadelphia, Dec. 12, 2005, on the reception of American forces in Iraq

"I mean, I read the newspaper. I mean, I can tell you what the headlines are. I must confess, if I think the story is, like, not a fair appraisal, I'll move on. But I know what the story's about." —Philadelphia, Dec. 12, 2005

"[I]t's a myth to think I don't know what's going on. It's a myth to think that I'm not aware that there's opinions that don't agree with mine, because I'm fully aware of that."—Philadelphia, Dec. 12, 2005

"I mean, there was a serious international effort to say to Saddam Hussein, you're a threat. And the 9/11 attacks extenuated that threat, as far as I—concerned."—Philadelphia, Dec. 12, 2005


"Those who enter the country illegally violate the law."
—Tucson, Ariz., Nov. 28, 2005

"We got the best workforce in America—in the world."
—Washington, D.C., Dec. 2, 2005

"As a matter of fact, I know relations between our governments is good."—On U.S.-South Korean relations, Washington, D.C., Nov. 8, 2005

"Let me be very clear about this. Steroids ought to be banned from baseball."—Washington, D.C., Oct. 4, 2005

"Bin Laden says his own role is to tell Muslims, quote, 'what is good for them and what is not.' "—Washington, D.C., Oct. 6, 2005


"I think it's important to bring somebody from outside the system, the judicial system, somebody that hasn't been on the bench and, therefore, there's not a lot of opinions for people to look at." —On the nomination of Harriet Miers to the Supreme Court, Washington, D.C., October 4, 2005


"We look forward to hearing your vision, so we can more better do our job. That's what I'm telling you."—Gulfport, Miss., Sept. 20, 2005.

"Listen, I want to thank leaders of the—in the faith—faith-based and community-based community for being here."—Washington, D.C., Sept. 6, 2005.


"If it were to rain a lot, there is concern from the Army Corps of Engineers that the levees might break. And so, therefore, we're cautious about encouraging people to return at this moment of history."—Washington, D.C., Sept. 19, 2005

"My thoughts are, we're going to get somebody who knows what they're talking about when it comes to rebuilding cities."—On how the rebuilding of New Orleans might commence, Biloxi, Miss., Sept. 2, 2005

"And Brownie, you're doing a heck of a job."—To FEMA director Mike Brown who resigned 10 days later amid criticism over his job performance.—Mobile, Ala., Sept. 2, 2005


"Out of the rubbles of Trent Lott's house—he's lost his entire house—there's going to be a fantastic house. And I'm looking forward to sitting on the porch." —Mobile, Ala., Sept. 2, 2005

"I can't wait to join you in the joy of welcoming neighbors back into neighborhoods, and small businesses up and running, and cutting those ribbons that somebody is creating new jobs."—Poplarville, Miss., Sept. 5, 2005


"So please give cash money to organizations that are directly involved in helping save lives—save the life who had been affected by Hurricane Katrina."—Washington D.C., Sept. 6, 2005


"The best place for the facts to be done is by somebody who's spending time investigating it."—Expressing hope that the probe into how CIA agent Valerie Plame's identity was leaked will yield answers, Washington D.C., July 18, 2005


"I'm looking forward to a good night's sleep on the soil of a friend."—On the prospect of visiting Denmark, Washington D.C., June 29, 2005

"I was going to say he's a piece of work, but that might not translate too well. Is that all right, if I call you a 'piece of work'?"—To Jean-Claude Juncker, prime minister of Luxembourg, Washington, D.C., June 20, 2005


"You see, not only did the attacks help accelerate a recession, the attacks reminded us that we are at war."—Washington, D.C., June 8, 2005

"We're spending money on clean coal technology. Do you realize we've got 250 million years of coal?"—Washington, D.C., June 8, 2005


"I think younger workers—first of all, younger workers have been promised benefits the government—promises that have been promised, benefits that we can't keep. That's just the way it is."—Washington, D.C., May 4, 2005

"We got people working all their life at hard work, contributing by payroll taxes into a Social Security system."—Washington, D.C., May 13, 2005


"See, in my line of work you got to keep repeating things over and over and over again for the truth to sink in, to kind of catapult the propaganda."—Greece, N.Y., May 24, 2005

"It means your own money would grow better than that which the government can make it grow. And that's important."—on what private accounts could do for Social Security funds, Falls Church, Va., April 29, 2005


"But Iraq has—have got people there that are willing to kill, and they're hard-nosed killers. And we will work with the Iraqis to secure their future." —Washington, D.C., April 28, 2005


"Well, we've made the decision to defeat the terrorists abroad so we don't have to face them here at home. And when you engage the terrorists abroad, it causes activity and action."—Washington, D.C., April 28, 2005

"He understands the need for a timely write of the constitution." —on Prime Minister Iyad Allawi of Iraq, Washington, D.C., April 28, 2005

"We expect the states to show us whether or not we're achieving simple objectives—like literacy, literacy in math, the ability to read and write."—on federal education requirements, Washington, D.C., April 28, 2005

"It's in our country's interests to find those who would do harm to us and get them out of harm's way."—Washington, D.C., April 28, 2005

"Part of the facts is understanding we have a problem, and part of the facts is what you're going to do about it."—Kirtland, Ohio, April 15, 2005

"We have enough coal to last for 250 years, yet coal also prevents an environmental challenge." —Washington, D.C., April 20, 2005

"We look forward to analyzing and working with legislation that will make—it would hope—put a free press's mind at ease that you're not being denied information you shouldn't see."
—Washington, D.C., April 14, 2005

"I understand there's a suspicion that we—we're too security-conscience."—Washington D.C., April 14, 2005

"I'm going to spend a lot of time on Social Security. I enjoy it. I enjoy taking on the issue. I guess, it's the Mother in me." —Washington D.C., April 14, 2005

"I want to thank you for the importance that you've shown for education and literacy."
—Washington, D.C., April 13, 2005

"If they pre-decease or die early, there's an asset base to be able to pass on to a loved one."—On Social Security money stored in private accounts, Cedar Rapids, Iowa, March 30, 2005

"I repeat, personal accounts do not permanently fix the solution."—Washington, D.C., March 16, 2005

"In terms of timetables, as quickly as possible—whatever that means."—On the president's time frame for shoring up Social Security, Washington D.C., March 16, 2005


"In this job you've got a lot on your plate on a regular basis; you don't have much time to sit around and wander, lonely, in the Oval Office, kind of asking different portraits, 'How do you think my standing will be?' "—Washington, D.C., March 16, 2005

"I believe we are called to do the hard work to make our communities and quality of life a better place."—Collinsville, Ill., Jan. 5, 2005


"After all, Europe is America's closest ally."—Mainz, Germany, Feb. 23, 2005

"This notion that the United States is getting ready to attack Iran is simply ridiculous. And having said that, all options are on the table."—Brussels, Belgium, Feb. 22, 2005 (Thanks to Fred Kaplan)

"If you're a younger person, you ought to be asking members of Congress and the United States Senate and the president what you intend to do about it. If you see a train wreck coming, you ought to be saying, what are you going to do about it, Mr. Congressman, or Madam Congressman?"—Detroit, Feb. 8, 2005

"Because the—all which is on the table begins to address the big cost drivers. For example, how benefits are calculate, for example, is on the table; whether or not benefits rise based upon wage increases or price increases. There's a series of parts of the formula that are being considered. And when you couple that, those different cost drivers, affecting those—changing those with personal accounts, the idea is to get what has been promised more likely to be—or closer delivered to what has been promised. Does that make any sense to you? It's kind of muddled. Look, there's a series of things that cause the—like, for example, benefits are calculated based upon the increase of wages, as opposed to the increase of prices. Some have suggested that we calculate—the benefits will rise based upon inflation, as opposed to wage increases. There is a reform that would help solve the red if that were put into effect. In other words, how fast benefits grow, how fast the promised benefits grow, if those—if that growth is affected, it will help on the red."—Explaining his plan to save Social Security, Tampa, Fla., Feb. 4, 2005

"I'm also mindful that man should never try to put words in God's mouth. I mean, we should never ascribe natural disasters or anything else, to God. We are in no way, shape, or form should a human being, play God."—Appearing on ABC's 20/20, Washington D.C., Jan. 14, 2005

"And that's why I'm here at the community college system today."—Jacksonville, Fla., Jan. 14, 2005

"I want to appreciate those of you who wear our nation's uniform for your sacrifice."—Jacksonville, Fla., Jan. 14, 2005

"We need to apply 21st-century information technology to the health care field. We need to have our medical records put on the I.T."—Collinsville, Ill., Jan. 5, 2005

"It's a time of sorrow and sadness when we lose a loss of life."—Washington, D.C., Dec. 21, 2004

"They can get in line like those who have been here legally and have been working to become a citizenship in a legal manner."—Referring to immigrant workers, Washington, D.C., Dec. 20, 2004

"And so during these holiday seasons, we thank our blessings. ... "—Fort Belvoir, Va., Dec. 10, 2004

"I always jest to people, the Oval Office is the kind of place where people stand outside, they're getting ready to come in and tell me what for, and they walk in and get overwhelmed by the atmosphere. And they say 'man, you're looking pretty.' "—Washington, D.C., Nov. 4, 2004

"I believe that, as quickly as possible, young cows ought to be allowed to go across our border."—Ottawa, Nov. 30, 2004

"The president and I also reaffirmed our determination to fight terror, to bring drug trafficking to bear, to bring justice to those who pollute our youth"—Speaking with Chilean President Ricardo Lagos, Santiago, Chile, Nov. 21, 2004

"We thought we were protected forever from trade policy or terrorist attacks because oceans protected us."—Speech to business leaders at APEC Summit, Santiago, Chile, Nov. 20, 2004

"After standing on the stage, after the debates, I made it very pla