Splinters of the SubtleConscious Soul
Hope my friend is OK
Sun, September 21, 2008 - 8:54 PMwww.minnpost.com/community...narchists_
First They Came For The Anarchists
By Mordecai Specktor | Tuesday, Sept. 16, 2008
My son Max was arraigned at the Ramsey County Law Enforcement Center on Wednesday, Sept. 3. He's in serious legal trouble.
In the aftermath of the Republican National Convention — and the arrests of more than 800 protesters, journalists and bystanders in the Twin Cities — Max and seven others, the alleged ringleaders of the RNC Welcoming Committee, have been charged with conspiracy to commit riot in the furtherance of terrorism.
That's right, terrorism.
...
Lurid allegations
The complaint in the case of the RNCWC 8 (shades of the Chicago 8, from another political convention brouhaha) contains lurid allegations about kidnapping Republican delegates, throwing Molotov cocktails, attacking law enforcement officers and burning tires on the freeway. The allegations are based on statements made by police plants in the group — CRIs, "confidential reliable informants."
"The charges in this case are supported only by allegations of paid confidential informants," Nestor told the reporters. "A number of the attorneys here have experience in investigations with the use of informants in political cases. We are concerned about the potential use of provocateurs, people who purposely plan and bring up discussions of violence, in order to get other people to respond and then report back that those discussions occurred. The confidential informants are paid based on the value of the information they provide. They have a clear incentive to exaggerate and lie about the information."
Nestor added that the allegations of kidnapping and violence, the "most outrageous allegations" made by the authorities — and the basis for the Aug. 30 SWAT team raids on three south Minneapolis homes — "are not supported by any evidence other than the statements of the confidential informants, they're not supported by the evidence seized."
Which brings us to the pails of urine. Ramsey County Sheriff Bob Fletcher proudly displayed 5-gallon pails of "urine" at a press conference following the raids. The anarchists ostensibly were fashioning IUDs (improvised urine devices) to use against cops and Republicans, according to the police authorities. The search warrants for the Aug. 30 SWAT team raids specified "urine and feces."
However, Nestor said that the "urine" seized was mostly "kitchen gray water" and had nothing to do with any of the defendants. Nestor also noted that "common household items" — glass bottles, rags and charcoal starter fluid, found in different locations in various houses — have repeatedly been referred to in news reports as bomb-making materials.
Warrant items not found
"We have search warrants seeking gun powder, explosive materials, Molotov cocktails, none of which were found," Nestor said. "We have the sheriff displaying a single plastic item, which he claims is a shield; as if, somehow, one shield was going to protect demonstrators from 3,500 armed riot police who have projectile tear gas weapons."
Nestor concluded that the authorities have recklessly wielded the "terrorism charge" so that any political activist involved in planning civil disobedience could be labeled as a "domestic terrorist."
Attorney Larry Leventhal told the reporters that the complaint does not allege that any of the defendants physically attacked anybody or even "broke a window."
The complaints against the eight defendants, according to Leventhal, weave "a narrative of various meetings that they claim occurred over a number of years. … We have, basically, [the authorities] saying, Here are some people, they've associated with other bad people, and those people have done bad things. If we were to accept the standard that people who associate with others who may do bad things are subject to arrest — and that certainly should not be a standard in a civilized society — but if that were the standard, there's a lot of delegates who are in the Xcel Center that have been associating with bad people who have done very bad things."
Leventhal termed the case a "political prosecution," which is characterized by people being targeted and arrested for "their thoughts, for their ideas — which may be different from the reigning political powers' — rather than for things they have done."
Sun, September 21, 2008 - 8:54 PM -
permalink -
3 Comments
3 Comments |
add a comment |
|
Mon, September 22, 2008 - 8:42 AM
in my thoughts, too...
Hi Mello-
I am keeping my fingers crossed for your friend (and his friends), and also hoping that every lawyer who is concerned about the first amendment, the constitution, and this country is on this. Pro bono should be easy here, because afterall, if this system falls, they will be out of work, too. I'm not an alarmist, and I have also been around too much to deny that among your friends' group of friends are people who "do want to see the system fall"-- mostly (I think) because they haven't really thought it through. From my point of view, there is a whole lot more risk of failure involved with revolution than with evolution. But I also realize and support that what your friend and his friends are trying to do is to EVOLVE the system by PARTICIPATING in it. And the "controls" that are being exerted on that right these days are unconscionable. It's hard (impossible) to dispute that various law enforcment agencies, from federal LEOs to local police departments, are getting grants from "Homeland Security" to spend large sums of money on "domestic disturbance" help- including the latest new-fangled "non-lethal" (but no one ever said anything about harmless, eh?) "crowd control" devices (tasers, rubber bullets filled with teargas, etc), and training in how to "interdict" "domestic terrorists." And, in my opinion, they are now going out and looking for reasons and places to play with their toys. That no one seems to be troubled by the fact that there is no voted-upon definition of what domestic terrorism is, or any apparent desire to figure out how to "contradict it" in a constructive way-- hey, how about giving people meaningful input?? The globally laughed-at "protest zone" in the back parking lot at the RNC convention, for example, is NOT constructive, but it certainly is chilling (which is the intent, apparently). Collectively, by starting from the point of view that people who just want to have their say are "terrorists", and by reacting to situations from this point of view, these people are CREATING this reality, that they apparently want-- although I wonder if they've thought through the reason(s) that they want it-- just so they can play with their toys? I LOVE this country. I LOVE the fact that I have the freedom to be expressing the words that are coming out of my brain at this minute. But I am very concerned. I LOVE the fact that at least so far, I have as much right to create my reality as anyone else. And I just hope against hope that those who want t create a constructive reality are able to do so. All I can say is, keep on participating. And if you have it in you, try to participate by getting INTO the system, instead of trying to force change from the outside. In 20 years, it will be you and me and us who are "the establishment", so we might as well get started. Hope that overall, all is well in your world, and keep on shining! love, Chris |
|
Tue, September 23, 2008 - 12:54 PM
Thank you for that great post, Chris. I totally agree with you about the idea that "anarchists" haven't really things out, esp revolution vs evolution. Recently, I had a chance to view the great HBO mini-series about John Adams, where the American and French revolutions were portrayed as not always being just or right in the actions people took as a means to an end, and it was rather horrifying, even several centuries later, some of the things that were perpetrated in the name of "revolution".
I do agree that change comes best from working inside the system. This is something I have thought about for a long time, in terms of removing myself from the world of journalism because I was appalled at how low the standards for reporting the truth became during the Clinton administration. If you've haven't seen it, there is an excellent documentary called "The Hunting of the President", that details how the media totally played along with the neo-Cons in attempting to discredit both Bill and Hillary, even to the point of printing very questionable stories from very questionable people with very questionable motives, and the media's lack of investigation into the matters and sources. It's like the media moved from being the Fourth Estate to being a propaganda tool of the right. And because of the proliferation of such "yellow journalism, I opted out. But that was not the right tactic to take, and I realize that now. If nothing else, silence is complicity. Mello, I hope your friend comes out of this okay. I've said this before to many people, but in these times, which I believe will get darker in the very near future, one HAS to know the hearts of the people who are close to you. And if a person doesn't know his own heart, you can't know it either. |
|
Wed, October 1, 2008 - 7:44 AM
Electric Storm
At the end of times, here, fellas.
THEM are getting really scared. We will overthrow them... and they are looking to head us off at the pass, but they look in places of love for war cuz they know the love will win but not thru war and so they lose. Unfortunatley, some of us are caught up in their stormy raids of lies and carefully planned deciet. They will be exposed. This will be good. *Blessed Be* |
