My Blog

The Owlentine's Day Blog

   Fri, February 13, 2009 - 2:00 PM
I was struck by a powerful thought a few weeks ago that has managed to diffuse any sentimentality about Valentine's Day for me this year. Valentine's Day, for many people, is SAD (Singles Awareness Day).

The marketing machine plows through our collective consciousness and unconsciousness, creating feelings of inadequacy for many of us who have no sweetheart, no flowers or candy or romantic dates. But this is hardly news for those of us who are unattached. If you've spent as many of your years single and unattached as I have, you have a lot of time to ruminate about your situation, as not only the self but the relatives and friends ask, "Why haven't you gotten married yet?"

What I'm about to say might exile us to a life of indefinite if not permanent singlehood, or maybe it will liberate us and even make us available to the partner we've always dreamed about.

The simple thought I'm putting forward is this: A relationship is a response, and not a goal.

Perhaps we've all held relationship as a goal. I know I have. "I want to be married some day." "I don't want to be alone." "I want to find my soulmate." When there is a goal, there is always looking to the future for a change in status, and with that, typically a lack of capacity for living in the present. It's natural enough, especially if you want to be a parent someday, or if there are things you fantasize about doing with a partner, generally and specifically.

What's interesting about this is that there is a role, a blank line __________ of your imagination that may or may never be filled by a special stranger. Perhaps you have a plan, and you're hoping that the universe, God, the Goddess, or whatever higher power you believe in, will provide this very special character actor to round out your special cast.

Let's look at the notion of relationship as a response. Backing away from the model of a romantic relationship, most all of our non-blood relationships are responses. I meet a guy at work, we converse about things that interest us, and we decide to hang out after work and share a drink. Over time we get to become good friends, sharing things that matter to us. Our response to encountering each other takes the form of a friendship. I eat lunch at the same restaurant every week and pretty soon the waitress knows my usual order, and over time we learn more about each other and begin a friendship that exists within the confines of the restaurant. We are responding to each other as customer and server, and then as friends because we like each other. If either of us were unfriendly, there would be no response, no relationship.

Looking at past loves with whom I'm still connected in some way, perhaps there was a goal of relationship, and that relationship ended, and whatever is left is my response to the human being whom I was privileged to spend time with. That response could be an ongoing connection, perhaps no connection at all, or something occasional. But interestingly, whatever remains may have authenticity that was lacking in the romantic phase of our relationship, simply because it arises from something that is there, instead of a goal that is created. In the same way, even a relationship that begins as a goal and deepens over time, if it is healthy, transitions to a response to the reality of who your partner is, rather than a goal. If the person remains a character, a role, instead of a "what-you-see-is-what-you-get human being, the relationship will fail, will be miserable, or both.

So consider yourself as a response waiting to happen, indeed, happening to everyone you meet in some way. Every day is the opportunity to respond to someone new, to create new relationship, to bring new levels of chaos, amusement, and depth into your life.

It has been surmised that you can't love any two people the same way, that love is defined anew every time you fall in love. I believe this is true. And I believe this is because love is, at its core, a response to someone. You cannot respond to a unique, individual human being the very same way you would a different unique, individual human being. Using the metaphor of alchemy for relationship, all of us are distinct elements that react to each other. Every combination of elements causes a unique reaction. We see that one person brings out the best in us without even trying, while another person seems to cause us to misspeak, misstep, get angry or flustered, or be awkward. Still others are like "inert" elements to us, that seem to cause no immediate reaction whatsoever.

So, if Singles Awareness Day is causing you anxiety or regret, try on this new context. Notice how you respond and react to the people you encounter in your day-to-day life. If relationship still occurs as a goal despite your best efforts, try making it into a game of just observing whom you respond to, and observing the responses. In the meantime, know that you have plenty of other elements to respond to that may show up as a myriad of relationships: best friends, lovers, companions, all based on the natural, organic response of your personal alchemy. Put yourself in the "science lab" of life as fully as you can, and enjoy all the natural relationships that ensue.

Of course, this could just be another one of many vain explanations I have come up with to explain something that I wish I had a better explanation for. But hey, I do enjoy many responsive relationships and I am happy. May you enjoy this day and whatever it brings to you. Al



8 Comments

add a comment
Fri, February 13, 2009 - 3:02 PM
Fucking ay...nice work. This is something that puts my life into a great perspective. After a montage of frazzled "relationships as goals" I've been trying on "Lovership".... I have people that want "partnership and relationship" but really they want me to committ to a goal. Weekly, monthly yearly...and expectations. I can't necesarily know the answers even if I can easily committ to the present. Some will say that I'm being fickle, or that I can't get close to people, but I'm noticing that I CAN get close to people. Very close, and I can be very, very present. I enjoy this much better than being with someone and having to live in the future with them. I enjoy planning, and I enjoy considering the future.....but that is much different.

Not to say that relationship as a goal is bad. I think that is wonderful when it works for two people.

I'm just sayin' I agree with you - that it is hard to pin-point and that being present and clear is much better than clouded.

"Singles Awareness Day?" I personally really love my life right now. It has it's challenges, but it's better in many ways and I certainly don't feel un-loved. Thanks for this blog.
Fri, February 13, 2009 - 4:03 PM
We've entered the time when awareness of our Soul's desire requires
we release all attachments and follow our Divine Plan. And the Soul's DP unfurls itself each moment, marriage as a goal no longer makes any sense.

My Twin Ray and I came together last February for declared non-attached live together relationship. She moved out today heading to Boulder to follow her DP. I return to Houston tomorrow to an empty house from which I am moving to Costa Rica for as longer as my Soul desires me there. We will meet as our Soul guides and perhaps come together to transition out of body at some future linear time, whenever.

In this phase of New Earth the word relationship carries to much baggage as to romance - that all bullshit based on separation consciousness, lack consciousness and thinking some else can fix us or make us whole. We are the only one with the power to make us whole.
Blessed IS,
Jeremiah
Fri, February 13, 2009 - 7:02 PM
Wise words, Owl.
Thank you. :)
Sat, February 14, 2009 - 12:04 PM
Nice, Owl!

This is why I find it so valuable to get to know people as friends, with no expectations of a romantic relationship. That way you learn to love them for who they are rather than looking at any personality traits and/or habits through the lens of "can I live with this behavior long term?' Once you get to know someone with no attachment, you start to appreciate and love the things you might have considered flaws if you'd gotten to know them within the expectation of a romantic relatioinship. If you can not only tolerate, but actually celebrate these differences in another person, that's a good indication of whether a romance with them will work on your end. (Now to see if THEY can accept who YOU are!!!)
Sat, February 14, 2009 - 6:02 PM
I think this is a hard day being single. I love to love to the fullest and giving it freely and very often is amazing especially when you receive it the same way. I spent the last 2 days deliviering flowers for a flower shop and i had an opportunity to read everyones love notes and it kind of made me sad. Then it made me feel happy to give the symbols of love to them. Love is everything. I miss it so, from my Love.
Happy Valentines day to everyone who feels love to the fullest in anything , every way and everything.
Sat, February 14, 2009 - 11:48 PM
my response:
Eye love you, Al!!!

Beautifully written, stated, felt, delivered and received.

And, can I publish this in The RAY?
I'm not sure which issue, but man, you gave great insight and I believe it's RAY-worthy.

BlesSings and love,
Ariella
Thu, February 19, 2009 - 9:01 AM
That was really insightful.

Your expression displays in a very tangible way the benefits of living in presence and appreciation of each moment and interaction. And inspires people to do so.

Thanks, Owl!
Thu, February 26, 2009 - 4:08 PM
This is profound. Thank you!
May I quote? ...“The simple thought I'm putting forward is this: A relationship is a response, and not a goal.” Funny though, in the end, even though we’d like to think we have no goals, no agendas, no plan- we still have criteria. I don’t believe anyone can deny this. Deep down, a man knows he will not see a woman who has children, or a woman who is uneducated… A woman knows she will not see a man who is not confident or is not family-oriented.

[[ we all have certain criteria at key stages in our lives but it limits us ]]

My only criteria now: non-smoker, intelligent & a sense of humor. I have stood firm on these requirements. My list of requirements has gotten smaller and smaller as the years go by due to the simple fact it is assumed most men I meet are compassionate, generous, honest, open, protective, courageous and generally happy. Am I a dreamer, or what? Not when I didn’t make him, its not my job to fix him and I know there’s no way in hell I’m going to change him. Couples are most compatible and the relationship most viable when each has his own hobbies, his own occupation and their education levels are pretty much even. Again, this is assuming each human component is "happy".

No, Al this is not one of your vain explanations. You may be vain, a little, a teensy-weensy bit *giggle* but that doesn’t mean your ideas aren’t without merit. (Look at those dimples, I tell you.) You have brought to light a very valid point: “You cannot respond to a unique, individual human being the very same way you would a different unique, individual human being.” [[ There may be conflict if your response to a particular person is a response to a person in character. ]] “If the person remains a character, a role, instead of a "what-you-see-is-what-you-get human being, the relationship will fail, will be miserable, or both.”

EXCELLENT. Brilliant.