collapse module

Toxic Reverend

offline 72 friends
joined on 05/11/05
last updated 09/23/13
collapse module

My Blog's

Two article and the my Google + profile 4 the Toxic Reverend

A new method of entrapment, by Brian Rothery December 2011
Images of child pornography to entrap the innocent activist editor

For those that want 2 know;
19 Posts That Got people arrested for making the posts
Huffington Post Catharine Smith and Bianca Bosker August 16 2010
Please feel free 2 share this - TR

Mostly, I am using Google + profile at
Tue, February 28, 2012 - 5:04 AM permalink - 0 comments
The normal testis, left, comes from a healthy male rat.
Tissues center and right come from a rat exposed to
toxic chemicals known as"endocrine disruptors"

Here is a recently added reference article:

Pollutant Changes Sexual Preference AAAS article
by Cassandra Willyard on 30 November 2010

But before I get into that, lets be clear about this.

Your gonads are a part of what modern medicine
calls the "Endocrine System".

So when you hear them talking about Toxic chemical
exposures to "endocrine disruptors" they are
talking about "Ball Busters", Egg Crunchers",
"Breast Levelers"
The "Toxic Sermon" that I am preaching about this
demands participation form the congregation.
So feel free to "shout it out", if you think you have
any alternative names ( euphemism's ) for these toxic
chemicals known as "endocrine disruptors"

Toxic chemical exposures in the "endocrine disrupting" class.
Several articles are linked into this blog of
"Connect the Toxic Dots".

It is advised that you read through this posting
before checking the verifiable reference material.
Peer reviewed medical journal aticles are cited and
linked in below, after the "Toxic Tweets" that "connect the dots"
of censored news stories.

Please note that the article about mercury being a
pollutant that can Change Sexual Preference DOES NOT
consider the cumulative effects, nor the effects of mixing
lead or any other chemical in with the exposure to mercury.

Caution: Connecting these "Toxic Tweets"
can reveal a rather perverse scenario that is "all about the money"

Updates for this blog are stories that I had posted at my
Toxic Reverend Twitter profile at

Pollutant Changes Sexual Preference AAAS article
by Cassandra Willyard on 30 November 2010
From 12-04-10

Also note Twitter posting of 11-12-10
"Straightkink" follow money trail pornography statistics link 2 PDF download
where the money goes plus priests on porn survey results
(More money than the football, baseball and basketball sports, combined.
Only a few large companies make the money and the porn stars get very little cash)

And Twitter posting's of 01-09-10
Money trail Who is Who in the toxic chemical war of your health
Reform of Toxic Chemicals Law Collapses as Industry Flexes Its Muscles
FDA needs overhaul report by National Research Council, Institute of Medicine
commissioned by Sen. Herb Kohl (D-Wis.)

These next two are from 11-19-10

S-510 Food Safety Modernization' Act The Most Dangerous Bill In American History
by Former FDA Safety Investigator

The Evil S 510 Food Safety Bill and an alternate action plan

And the final Toxic Tweet to cite here from 12-28-10, the highly censored report:

poison for profit what a business plan By Ashley Simmons Hotz

End of updates from -"Toxic Reverend Tewwts"

Since the gonads that produce sexual hormones are in the "endocrine
system", you might think of these toxic chemicals as "Ball Busters",
Egg Crunchers, Prostate Pluggers, and Mound Levelers (Breast Cancer).
Some how, these terms seem more defining than
"endocrine disrupting chemicals".

An article that lists peer reviewed medical journal
articles about common toxic chemicals that can
feminize boys and cause girls to become masculine
that was published by Green Peace and titled "Fragile"
is linked in with a few other articles below.

From Green Peace:
Our reproductive health and chemical exposure ...
May 2, 2006 ... This report collates the findings of
a number of peer-reviewed scientific studies of
recent years. Together, the studies show for the
first time a comprehensive picture of an increase in
reproductive health disorders, mirroring the rising
presence in our lives of man-made chemicals. - 32k -

Also see:

The professionally acclaimed
Chemical Exposures: Low Levels and High Stakes, Second Edition
by Nicholas A. Ashford and Claudia S. Miller
View full version in PDF - FREE
or buy a hard copy from Amazon for about $100

In every day terms: "The Toxic Lotto" is also applicable to this:

The Toxic Lotto - Revelations

Widespread Pollutants with Endocrine-disrupting Effects
From "Our Stolen Future"


About the photo posted at the top of this blog:

The normal testis, left, comes from a healthy male rat.
Tissues center and right come from a rat exposed to
DEHP while its reproductive tract was maturing. The
center tissue is a small testis filled with fluid. The
corresponding tissue from the other side of the same
animal exhibits no visible testis or sperm-storing
epididymis. Another DEHP-exposed animal from
the same set of EPA tests developed a "testis" that
was nothing but a sack of blood.

The photo was taken from an article titled:

New Concerns About Phthalates
Author(s): RALOFF, JANET
Source: Science News, 09/02/2000, Vol. 158 Issue 10, p152, 3p, 5c.
Reports on concerns about phthalates, which serve as softeners that make rigid materials turn flexible. Linkage between cancer in adults to heavy exposure to some phthalates; Findings that a few phthalates have the potential to disrupt boys' reproductive development; Description of the research to test phthalates levels in humans. - 36k


Our Stolen Future
Widespread Pollutants - with Endocrine-disrupting Effects


Washing and disinfecting plastic items can cause a
very toxic chemical reaction and release higher levels
of BPA and other toxic chemicals.

In reference:

Article titled;
Protecting Yourself From Unsafe Plastics,
By Sharon Levy
National Wildlife Magazine, February / March issue, Vol.42, No.2


Dr. Theo Colborn, the founder of the Endocrine Disruption Exchange,
tells researchers working with her to toss out plastic water bottles and
use stainless steel instead. “I don’t have plastic food containers in my
house,” she added. “I use glass.”


There is a peer reviewed medical
journal that was published, indicating
that the majority of mental illnesses are
caused by toxic chemical exposures. My
perspective is that such chemical
exposures can also hinder Spiritual
development as well as interfere with
and "corrupt" sexual desires.

In reference:

Title of article:
Environmental Connections: A Deeper Look into Mental Illness
Published by:
Environmental Health Perspectives
Volume 115, Number 8, August 2007

Their "general conclusion" (in the above article) is that
mental illness is not "so genetic" and most likely due
to toxic chemical exposures.

Environmental Health Perspectives (EHP )
a monthly journal of peer-reviewed research and news
on the impact of the environment on human health.
EHP is published by the National Institute of Environmental
Health Sciences and its content is free online. Print issues
are available by paid subscription.


Here is an excerpt from the "introduction" of
a UCSF research article;

Over the past decade, it has become clear that the brain
synthesizes steroid hormones by using some of the same
steroidogenic enzymes found in adrenals and gonads
(reviewed in refs. 1 and 2). These compounds were given
the name neurosteroids (3), and some of their functions
have been elucidated (4).

The above excerpt is from:

Selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors directly alter
activity of neurosteroidogenic enzymes
By Lisa D. Griffin*,dagger and Synthia H. Mellon*,Dagger
Vol. 96, Issue 23, 13512-13517, November 9, 1999


Newborn girls, boys behavior differs after prenatal phthalate exposure.


Effects of perinatal exposure to PCBs and dioxins on play behavior
in Dutch children at school age.
Vreugdenhil HJ et al. Environ Health Perspect. 2002 Oct;110(10):A593-8.


Recent reports show the toxic chemical known as BPA ( a neurotoxin and
an endocrine disruptor) to be present in over ninety percent of Americanan's.
Another chemical used in hand sanitizers (and many other products) has been
detected in four out of five Americans. Both can feminize boys.


Following excerpt is from Kristof’s blog “On the Ground,” found here:
November 7, 2009, 9:22 pm

Is That a Plastic Bottle You’re Drinking From?
By Nicholas Kristof

For the effects on reproductive health, the most crucial period may be the
first trimester of pregnancy (when sex differentiation occurs) and to a lesser
extent the rest of pregnancy and childhood up through adolescence. These
are times in the life cycle when the body has few hormones, and so some
extra estrogen may fool the body into triggering changes (such as early
puberty or feminization of male genitalia). After adolescence, the body
already has so many hormones that a modest increase in estrogen may
make much less difference.

Still, it’s troubling to see the recent studies showing that higher levels of
BPA in the blood correlate to obesity, diabetes, miscarriages and
cardiovascular problems — even in adults who have plenty of hormones
in their bodies. For safety’s sake, I’m steering clear of BPA to the extent I
can. The FDA has generally dropped the ball on regulation of chemicals
over the years, particularly in the Bush years, but it is now reviewing BPA again

End of excerpt from:
Kristof’s blog “On the Ground,”


The Center for Disease Control (CDC) released a new study
showing that nearly all Americans are contaminated with oxybenzone,
a widely-used sunscreen ingredient. This chemical so far has been
linked to allergies, hormone disruption, and cell damage, as well as
low birth weight in baby girls whose mothers are exposed during
pregnancy. (NaturalNews, Friday, April 11, 2008)

Also See:
Which Sunscreens are Safest? | Environmental Working Group
First-ever online database rates sunscreen safety and effectiveness ...
Today, the Environmental Working Group (EWG) released the ... - 27k - Jun 24, 2007


A chemical called "triclosan" from antibacterial soap (and many
other products) has been found in about four out of five American's.
Triclosan is used in every thing from toothpaste to keyboards.

Antibacterial soaps and body washes containing the chemical
triclosan don’t have extra health benefits compared with regular
soap and water, the Food and Drug Administration said on its Web site

Triclosan: What Consumers Should Know

Many suntan lotions also contain triclosan, as reported by
the Environmental Working group and the
"Skin Deep - triclosan" web page.


Subject: R&D
Weight Problems and
Various probable factors in early puberty

Example of information from Fox News from Reuters news:
Girls' Early Puberty Raises More Health Problems
August 09, 2010 | Reuters

The following are some of the factors and influences that have
been ignored in an effort to claim "ignorance" by the powers that be :>

Bovine Growth Hormone Fox Lawsuit
Documentation is at
Simplified Youtube video on BGH by Steve Wilson
Ex Fox Investigative Reporter is also
Exposing a conspiracy of controlled health care corruption.
Posted at;
More information can be found at
Not Milk

And this BGH
only one aspect or "influence" from the perspective of
"Toxic Lotto". Other factors being estrogen mimicking
chemical from antibacterial soaps (that are in most
Americans), as well as estrogen mimicking hormones
in soy products that are now in many of our foods that
you would not even suspect.

Still, one has to wonder exactly what effect BGH
might be having with our nations weight problem ?

Fore example:
Triclosan estrogen mimicking

"Three-quarters of Americans are carrying traces of Triclosan in the blood."

One of the main sources of exposure is the use of
antibacterial soaps. But it is in everything from
toothpaste to one really long list of various stuff.



Database lists illnesses with toxic
chemicals that can cause them is now
linked in with a review and comments at

Feel free to re-post and forward.


Tom Krohmer
Environmental Technologist
The Toxic Reverend
Justice Is Homeless
Sat, June 28, 2008 - 4:46 PM permalink - 0 comments
Copy / paste from my Gmail account drafts folder:>

Which Sunscreens are Safest? | Environmental Working Group
First-ever online database rates sunscreen safety and effectiveness ...
Today, the Environmental Working Group (EWG) released the ... - 27k - Jun 24, 2007

The sunscreen myth:
How sunscreen products actually promote cancer
Friday, June 15, 2007 by: Mike Adams, News Target

Excerpt from article:

the toxic chemical ingredients used in most sunscreen products are actually
carcinogenic and have never been safety tested or safety approved by
the FDA. They get absorbed right through the skin (a porous organ that absorbs
most substances it comes into contact with) and enter the bloodstream.

End of excerpt.

The attached article on sunlight and the best ways to protect yourself is from:
Beyond Health
Sunlight and Health

by Raymond Francis

In a number of BHN issues beginning in July/August of '96, we have told our
readers that, contrary to popular belief, sunlight does not cause cancer. In
fact cancer rates are much lower where there is more sunlight. I have
recently come across an excellent book by Zane Kime, MD titled Sunlight.
Dr. Kime looks at the relationship of sunlight and human health. He takes
studies from the scientific literature and demonstrates sunlight's beneficial
effects in lowering cholesterol, blood pressure, and blood sugar. He cites
how sunlight increases endurance, sex hormone levels, and immunity.
The book also contains dietary suggestions on how to protect your
skin from sun damage the way nature intended.

It's easy to forget, in the midst of our cancer epidemic, that cancer was
traditionally a rare disease affecting less than 1% of the population. The
healthy, long-lived populations like the Hunzas and the Vilcabambas
lived at high elevations where the sun was more intense. They were
out farming every day. Yet they lived to very old ages without getting
cancer. If the sun causes cancer, how did these people and others
like the Polynesians ever survive? Skin cancer is the end-result of
many factors of which inappropriate sun exposure is only one.

Like a lot of things, too much of a good thing can be bad for you.
The sun is essential to health, but too little or too much sun will
damage health. The sun can do damage if we use it improperly.
And use it improperly is what most of us do. Studies show that the
incidence of all malignancy is 6 to 10 times lower closer to the
equator where there is more sunlight, and people who have
chronic exposure to the sun are less likely to develop melanoma
than urbanized people who have intermittent exposure.

One of the reasons for lower cancer rates may be that people
who are out in the sun all the time form pigments that protect
them from the sun, and their sun exposure makes them healthier
in the first place. Urban dwellers don't get enough healthy sun
exposure. They often get intermittent tans that fade. Repeating
this cycle may result in damage because the skin is not protected
during the tanning process. Also the urban dweller is much more
likely to burn during the tanning process. Some researchers
believe that burns are a key to skin cancer. Turning into a
red lobster is definitely not conducive to good health, as any
lobster can attest.

No one is arguing that sunlight doesn't trigger free radical activity
and that the amount of free radicals doesn't increase with the
intensity of the sunshine. These free radicals can cause skin
to age prematurely, wrinkle, and sunburn, and can damage
DNA and cause skin lesions. However, research shows that
diets rich in carotenes and other antioxidants protect the
skin against the hazards of ultraviolet sunlight. Carotenes
are a class of compounds found in plants, fruits, and
vegetables that reduce the free radical activity that causes
damage and premature aging of cells. Research has shown
that diets rich in carotenes reduce the risk of cancer and
prevent the damage to DNA that results in a number of
degenerative diseases. In fact carotenes are being called
nature's "sun umbrella." Carotenes are used up during
exposure to sunlight, so one's dietary supply must be
adequate to provide continuous protection. Here's the
problem. Very few Americans are getting adequate
amounts of fresh fruits and vegetables in their diet.
We are blaming the sun for problems caused by
poor diets and excessive inappropriate exposures.

What about sunscreens? A few decades of increasing
sunscreen use has done nothing to stop the increasing
rate of skin cancer. In fact, the chemicals in sunscreens
may even become carcinogenic when exposed to sunlight.
Researchers at the University of Pennsylvania say that
broad-spectrum sunscreens still aren't broad enough
to cover the full spectrum of potentially harmful light.
Ultraviolet radiation consists of over 100 separate
frequencies. Sunscreens don't protect against all,
and we don't know which are harmful and which
beneficial. We may even be blocking the wrong
ones. In addition, using a sunscreen can create
a false sense of security and cause people to
spend excessive amounts of time in the sun.
Researchers at the M.D. Anderson Cancer
Center in Houston say, "There is no substantial
evidence that sunscreen protects against any
of the three forms of skin cancer. Dr. Robin Marks,
a dermatologist and a professor at the University
of Melbourne says, "Relying on synthetic chemicals
to prevent cancer is laughable." Arthur Rhodes, a
University of Pittsburgh dermatologist, told a 1994
meeting of the American Cancer Society that
sunscreens "appear weakly effective or ineffective"
at preventing cancer.

The fact is we were designed to be out in the sun.
Sunlight is absolutely essential for good health in
so many ways that we don't even begin to understand
them. Unless you do something foolish, the sun won't
damage healthy people who have adequate amounts
of nutrients like carotenes, lycopene, essential fatty
acids, and vitamins A, C, E, and zinc and selenium.
Our need for the sun is exemplified by the fact that
nature intended we get most of our vitamin D from
the sun. Vitamin D is almost totally absent in vegetable foods.

When sunlight strikes the skin it sets off a multi-staged process whereby
cholesterol is ultimately changed into vitamin D. Vitamin D is essential
to the absorption of calcium from the intestines and for the production
of enzymes involved in collagen formation in the bones. Staying out of
the sun is partially responsible for our epidemic of osteoporosis,
especially in our elderly. One study found that 36% of elderly men
and 47% of elderly women were vitamin D deficient. Even moderate
sun exposure would help to alleviate this problem. However, sunlight
through window glass will not activate vitamin D synthesis.

Sunlight is absolutely essential to good health. Its only been in recent
times that the sun has been cast as our enemy. If getting too little or
too much sun is bad for us, how can the average person get what
they need without harming themselves? First of all get the sun slowly.
Secondly, stay out of the midday sun. Timing sun exposures to
avoid the hours of 10 to 2 PM will cut ultraviolet exposure by
60% because the sun is less intense. Most everyone should
try to get at least ten minutes in the sun on a daily basis and
longer on weekends. If you do it this way, your skin will adapt
through skin pigmentation and you won't get sunburned. Some
experts claim at least one hour of unfiltered sunlight per day is
essential to health. This doesn't have to be in direct sun, indirect
sunlight is acceptable but it should not be filtered through glass.
Sunlight into the retina is a very important nutrient. Retinas
need the whole spectrum of solar radiation, and wearing
glasses or contacts could screen out important frequencies
that are critical to long-term health. When you are in direct
sun for long periods, cover up. Wear a broad brimmed hat
and suitable clothing.

We need to protect against skin cancer both from the outside and the
inside. Getting an optimal amount of nutrients is essential. Eat a diet
that is rich in fresh, unrefined, essential fatty acids such as those
contained in Udo's Choice. A diet rich in carotenes is essential.
Supplementation with products like Caroplete should be considered.
Caroplete contains a natural mixture of carotenes including lycopene.
In addition, vitamins A, C, and E along with minerals like zinc and
selenium will help to both protect and repair skin.

How much sun is right for you depends on your biochemical
individuality. With a bit of awareness and following the above
suggestions, you should be able to develop a healthy golden
tan and reap the benefits of the sun without doing harm. Health
is a choice, and by developing good habits and making sensible
choices, the sun will be your friend and not your enemy.

Raymond Francis is an M.I.T.-trained scientist, a registered
nutrition consultant, author of Never Be Sick Again and Never
Be Fat Again, host of the Beyond Health Show, Chairman of
the The Project to End Disease and an internationally recognized
leader in the field of optimal health maintenance.

Reprinted with permission from:
Beyond Health® News
Subscriptions: Call 800-250-3063

Copyright 1997, Beyond Health

Sign up toBeyond Health to enjoy Free Access to -

* To enjoy all the Free Articles available
* Listen to Archived Radio Shows
* Enjoy our weekly NewsClips


---- End Of Forwarded / POSTED Message -----

Please forward and post.

Also note, Toxic Revelations has been censored and removed from
the Internet. Including the last two years that were in the Archives,
Way Back Machine. I am looking for another place to post, but also
need some editing help with web pages.

Toxic Revelations
^(Rough Draft of "abstract" was posted)^
Biological / Chemical Weapon Information, History & Treatments.
Verifiable sources and peer reviewed medical journals.


Tom Krohmer
Environmental Technologist

The Toxic Reverend
Who's a criminal ?

Homicide Charges For Corporations
No More Red Collar Crime

The Criminalization Of Homelessness;
A Problem Becoming A Solution

Toxic Revelations
^(Rough Draft of "abstract" is posted)^
Biological / Chemical Weapon Information, History & Treatments.
Verifiable sources and peer reviewed medical journals.

Please note:

The Gulf War Vets have posted
"Beyond Treason"

---- End Of Forwarded Message -----

The Toxic Reverend
Who's a criminal ?

Homicide Charges For Corporations

The Criminalization Of Homelessness;
A Problem Becoming A Solution

The Gospel of Toxic Revelations
^(Rough Draft of "abstract" wass posted)^
Biological / Chemical Weapon Information, History & Treatments.
Verifiable sources and peer reviewed medical journals.
This page has been censored and removed from the
Archives "Way Back Machine" to 2005. Trying to find a
server to re-post this censored information.
Could use some editing help too.

Please note:

The Gulf War Vets have posted
"Beyond Treason"

Fri, June 20, 2008 - 2:27 PM permalink - 0 comments
Lead exposure in children linked to violent crime

A study finds that even low levels can permanently damage the
brain. The research also shows that exposure is a continuing
problem despite efforts to minimize it.

By Thomas H. Maugh II and Marla Cone,
Los Angeles Times Staff Writers May 28, 2008

The first study to follow lead-exposed children from before birth into
adulthood has shown that even relatively low levels of lead permanently
damage the brain and are linked to higher numbers of arrests, particularly
for violent crime.

Earlier studies linking lead to such problems used indirect measures of
both lead and criminality, and critics have argued that socioeconomic and
other factors may be responsible for the observed effects.

But by measuring blood levels of lead before birth and during the first
seven years of life, then correlating the levels with arrest records and brain
size, Cincinnati researchers have produced the strongest evidence yet that
lead plays a major role in crime.

The researchers also found that lead exposure is a continuing problem
despite the efforts of the federal government and cities to minimize exposure.

The average lead levels in the study "unfortunately are still seen in many
thousands of children throughout the United States," said Philip J.
Landrigan, director of the Center for Children's Health and the
Environment at the Mount Sinai School of Medicine in New York.

The link between criminal behavior and lead exposure was found among
even the least-contaminated children in the study, who were exposed to
amounts of lead similar to what the average U.S. child is exposed to today,
said Landrigan, who was not involved in the study.

"People will sometimes say, 'This is in the past. We are cleaning up lead.
We don't have lead problems anymore,' " said criminologist Deborah W.
Denno of Fordham University in New York, who also was not involved in
the study. "The Ohio study says this is still a big problem."

Nationwide, about 310,000 children between the ages of 1 and 5 have blood
lead levels above the federal guideline of 10 micrograms per deciliter, and
experts suspect that many times that number have lower levels that are still

"It is a national disgrace that so many children continue to be exposed at
levels known to be neurotoxic," said neurologist David C. Bellinger of
Harvard Medical School, who wrote an editorial accompanying the study
published in the online journal PLoS Medicine.

Although some urban soil is still contaminated with lead from gasoline,
80% of lead exposure now comes from houses built before 1978. Paint in
such houses can contain as much as 50% lead, and even if it has been
covered by newer, lead-free paint, it still flakes or rubs off.

About 38 million U.S. homes, 40% of the nation's housing, still contain
lead-based paint, according to the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban
Development. The problem is particularly acute in urban areas, which
typically have older housing that has not been renovated.

More recently, parents and authorities have become concerned about
increasing levels of lead-based paint in toys imported from China.

Researchers have long known that lead exposure reduces IQ by damaging
brain cells in children during their early years.

It is also known that lead increases children's distractibility, impulsiveness
and restlessness and shortens their attention span, all factors considered
precursors of aggressive or violent behavior.

A landmark 1990 paper by Denno linked lead to increases in criminal
behavior, but the children in the study were not tested for lead levels. The
diagnoses were based on their physicians' evaluation, Denno said.

The Cincinnati lead study enrolled 376 pregnant women in Cincinnati's
inner city between 1979 and 1984, measuring their blood lead levels during
pregnancy and the children's levels during their first seven years of life.

In the new study, environmental health researcher Kim N. Dietrich of the
University of Cincinnati College of Medicine studied 250 of the original
group, correlating their lead levels with adult criminal arrest records from
Hamilton County, Ohio.

He and his colleagues found that 55% of the subjects (63% of males) had
been arrested and that the average was five arrests between the ages of 18
and 24.

The higher the blood lead level at any time in childhood, the greater the
likelihood of arrests. "The strongest association was with violent criminal
activity -- murder, rape, domestic violence, assault, robbery and possession
of weapons," Dietrich said.

Blood lead levels in the children ranged from 4 to 37 micrograms per

The researchers found, for example, that every 5-microgram-per-deciliter
increase in blood lead levels at age 6 was accompanied by a 50% increase in
the incidence of violent crime later in life. Confirming previous findings, the
effect of lead was strongest in males, who had an arrest rate 4 1/2 times that
of females.

In a related study, spectroscopist Kim M. Cecil of Cincinnati Children's
Hospital Medical Center and her colleagues examined a "representative
sample" of 157 members of the same group using whole-brain MRI scans.
They found that those with the highest blood levels of lead during childhood
had the smallest brain volume.

On average, the brains of those in the study were about 1.2% smaller than
normal. The most affected regions of the brain were those regulating
decision making, impulse control, attention, error detection, task completion
and reward-based decision making.

"The most important message is that lead affects brain volume, independent
of demographic and social factors that are often used to explain away poor
outcomes" in life, Cecil said. "This is independent biological evidence
showing that the brain is affected by lead."



FYI: a work in progress is posted at:

Suicide - Homicide and the Biochemistry of Crime.
Independent research:
Suicide - Homicide as it corresponds to
the Fight or Flight Response. ...
Sat, May 31, 2008 - 3:03 AM permalink - 0 comments
Quote from the story posted below;

Mobile phones could kill far more people than smoking or asbestos, a study
by an award-winning cancer expert has concluded. He says people
should avoid using them wherever possible and that governments and the
mobile phone industry must take "immediate steps" to reduce exposure to
their radiation.

The study, by Dr. Vini Khurana, is the most devastating indictment
yet published of the health risks.

..... End quote

Comment from TR:

While I do not use a cell phone, if I did have to, I would use a head set - TR


*Mobile Phones 'More Dangerous Than Smoking'*
Brain expert warns of huge rise in tumours and calls on industry to take
immediate steps to reduce radiation

By Geoffrey Lean, The Independent news
Sunday, 30 March 2008

Mobile phones could kill far more people than smoking or asbestos, a study by an
award-winning cancer expert has concluded. He says people should avoid using
them wherever possible and that governments and the mobile phone industry must
take "immediate steps" to reduce exposure to their radiation.

The study, by Dr. Vini Khurana, is the most devastating indictment yet published
of the health risks.

It draws on growing evidence -- exclusively reported in the IoS in October --
that using handsets for 10 years or more can double the risk of brain cancer.
Cancers take at least a decade to develop, invalidating official safety
assurances based on earlier studies which included few, if any, people who had
used the phones for that long.

Earlier this year, the French government warned against the use of mobile phones,
especially by children. Germany also advises its people to minimise handset use,
and the European Environment Agency has called for exposures to be reduced.

Professor Khurana -- a top neurosurgeon who has received 14 awards over the past
16 years, has published more than three dozen scientific papers -- reviewed more
than 100 studies on the effects of mobile phones. He has put the results on a
brain surgery website, and a paper based on the research is currently being
peer-reviewed for publication in a scientific journal.

He admits that mobiles can save lives in emergencies, but concludes that "there
is a significant and increasing body of evidence for a link between mobile phone
usage and certain brain tumours." He believes this will be "definitively proven"
in the next decade.

Noting that malignant brain tumours represent "a life-ending diagnosis," he adds:
"We are currently experiencing a reactively unchecked and dangerous situation."
He fears that "unless the industry and governments take immediate and decisive
steps," the incidence of malignant brain tumours and associated death rate will
be observed to rise globally within a decade from now, by which time it may be
far too late to intervene medically.

"It is anticipated that this danger has far broader public health ramifications
than asbestos and smoking," says Professor Khurana, who told the IoS his
assessment is partly based on the fact that three billion people now use the
phones worldwide, three times as many as smoke. Smoking kills some five million
worldwide each year, and exposure to asbestos is responsible for as many deaths
in Britain as road accidents.

Late last week, the Mobile Operators Association dismissed Khurana's study as "a
selective discussion of scientific literature by one individual." It believes he
"does not present a balanced analysis" of the published science, and "reaches
opposite conclusions to the W.H.O. and more than 30 other independent expert
scientific reviews."

...-- End Of Forwarded Message -----

.... edited .....

...-- End Of Forwarded Message -----


Tom Krohmer
Environmental Technologist
The Toxic Reverend
Justice Is Homeless
Who's a criminal ?

Homicide Charges For Corporations
(Rough draft posted with active reference links)
Sun, May 18, 2008 - 2:30 PM permalink - 0 comments
view all 46
collapse module

Reckless Operation of a Corporations

"American Roulette and Red Collar Crimes" rough draft
collapse module

Illnesses & Toxic Chemicals Database

Mostly I have been using Google+ at
The Toxic Reverend Google+ Postings

Database summarizes between chemical contaminants and
approximately 180 human diseases or conditions.

The above database is a work in progress. And I give a
review and comments about it, after these links to research
about this issue. With information that the database DOES
Not address. Such as the interactions of "non-lethal
biological weapons (Incapacitating Agents) the cumulative
effects (mixtures) of toxic chemical exposures as well as
nutritional combinations information (to be updated asp).


A quick note about other information that had been posted here:

Because of consistent censorship on the Internet of the
pages that were linked in here, some of it has been re-posted (again).

Who are the Criminals ? information is now at:

American Roulette - Red Collar Crime - Toxic Revelations
Revolvers are for Russians. We use products, services and labor rights.

We need mandatory criminal charges and sentencing against people
for the for the reckless operation of a corporation. If any of us drove a car
in the manner some of these C.E.O.'s operates a corporation, we would
be in jail.

The district attorney that convicted Jeffrey Dahmer also convicted ten
corporations of negligent homicide (162). But he did not convict any
people. Just the corporations. The reasons why this is so
rarely done and in this manner are investigated, here (work in progress).


Now back to the chronic Illnesses, chemical exposures and
infectious agents correlations and combinations.

The toxic chemical database DOES NOT consider the
"cumulative effects" (mixtures of) of toxic chemicals.

See (or search terms):>

The Toxic Lotto - Toxic Revelations

Excerpts from "The Toxic Lotto - Toxic Revelations"

To simplify the complexity of the controversy, I will give this
example. Bill Moyers of the Public Broadcasting System did
a show named Trade Secrets and has created a web page
of the same name (26). There is to much documentation
there to list, in regard to "industry" covering up the damage
to OUR HEALTH from toxic chemicals, for over fifty years.

He was tested for over 800 toxic chemicals and over 80 chemicals
(at various levels of exposure) were found, in him. That presents
the potential for more viable chemicals reaction variations than
the pick six lottery in one patient from the perspective of LDCETC's !
But regardless of this, many of the "tolerable levels of exposure" to
a (singular) toxic chemical have been fraudulently produced for decades.

In many instances, toxic chemicals can multiply in their "Toxic Impact",
rather than add. A recent example of a study that I heard about is rather
simple. They gave 100 rats the LD50 of lead. (The LD50 stands for
Lethal Dose 50 stands for 50 out of 100 of the rats die). They also
gave the 100 rats the LD50 of mercury and guess what? All of the
100 rats died. In many instances, the multiplication is much higher.
Hundreds of times more toxic, when certain chemicals mix. I have
heard thousands of times, in some circumstances.
In reference:

"Just as toxic chemicals can multiply in toxicity when mixed (and impair the
immune system, as can radiation exposure), so can infectious agents
multiply in their pathogenic potential, when combined" .

Nerve gas (a chemical weapon) has been diluted and re-packaged as
various pesticides. But it does not stop there.

Oother reasons I suspect the before mentioned database in not all
that accurate are:>

Less than 6% of 1,400 chemicals that threaten human health are tracked
A 5-2-2000 Congressional Report is linked into my blog of 1-23-10

More over, the database does not cosinr the manners in which toxic chemicals
can work with infectious agents and combinations of infectious agents!.

Some of the "sub-clinical" (not acute) infectious agents are also known
as "Incapacitating Agents". Of which are "non-leathal biological weapons".
The medical institutions stopped teaching resident doctors about some of
these "Incapacitating Agents" while the studied them as a biological weapon,
decades ago. Some (like mycoplasma's) have been genetically spliced and
"weaponized". Other infectious agents are also highly associated with chronic
illnesses, like Lymes Disease". A movie titled "Under Our Skin" can give you
a few more of the "other details", with regard to how the politics have enabled this.
As well as the aspect of the infectious agent that has been shown to cause Lyme
Disease (and mirrors Chronic Fatigue from mycoplasma infections) is cause
by an infectious agent that is listed as an "Incapacitating Agent" (non-lrethal
biological weapon) that does not seem to have existed a few decades ago.
The Lyme Disease infectious agent is "Borrelia burgdorferi sensu stricto".
If you want to know about the infectious cause of Lymes Disease in simple
terms, see Wikipedia >

If you want to know about the infectious causes of Chronic fatigue and
Gulf War Syndrome with peer reviewed medical journals and treatment
as well as simplified videos, see The Institute of Molecular Medicine at

Please remember that the symptoms of either infection (alone) can overlap
and that patients can test positive for both, with out so much as a tick byte.
In fact, more and more people are being diagnosed with Lymes Disease,
with out any sign of a tick byte.

There is also a group of over fifty Nobel Laureates and over 10,000 other
scientists thatare backing the
Union of Concerned scientists - "Scientific Integrity" Program
And their
"The A to Z Guide to Political Interference in Scienc"
Listed by government agency at

The professionally acclaimed
Chemical Exposures: Low Levels and High Stakes, Second Edition
by Nicholas A. Ashford and Claudia S. Miller
View full version in PDF - FREE
or buy a hard copy from Amazon for about $100

The Biomonitoring Program in California is now underway. The
upcoming "Public Input Meetings" with the nine member scientific
advisory panel that will decide who gets tested for what and how
they will get tested are posted at
the California Environmental Contaminant Biomonitoring Program

The cumulative effects of toxic chemicals and the various
chemical reactions from mixtures of such
chemicals is very complex.

You might want to check out the California EPA
Cumulative Impacts and Precautionary Approaches Work Group:
Agenda and Related Materials from the May 18, 2009, meeting

And while nutritional supplements also appear to work best
in combinations to aid in detoxification and strengthen the immune
system against infectious agents, not all supplements are the same.

This is complicated and obscured by the fact that over
one third of the vitamins and supplements on the
market today are bogus" ( 5a, 5b, 5c, 5d ,5e).

The reference articles for 5a, 5b, 5c, 5d ,5e are posted at
my blog of Tuesday, May 24, 2011
Revelations On Toxic Sun Tanning Lotions, Nutrition and Genetic response Modifications



Considering Cumulative Effects Under
the National Environmental Policy Act
Of particular interest at the above link is
"Chapter. 1 - Introduction to Cumulative Effects Analysis".

A partial version of the censored report "Toxic Revelations"
has been re-posted:
Toxic Revelations
Toxic chemicals can multiply in their toxicity
when mixed, as infectious agents can increase in
their pathogenetic potential when in combinations.
Editing, link updating and research in progress

My alternate web profile at MySpace has an
excellent video about such interactions of
toxic chemicals and the infectious agents that
are non-lethal biological weapons known as
"Incapacitating Agents".
The Toxic Reverend
Besides the video, there are a few blogs of interest
at the alternate "Toxic Reverend" profile, at Myspace
(link above). The video titled,
"Biological Warfare : Experiments On The American People"
is posted at:>

Now back to the toxic database and the "work in progress" -
with my review of it:

Database summarizes between chemical contaminants and
approximately 180 human diseases or conditions.

Example; The database lists smoking being associated
with macular degeneration. But the pesticide regulations with
tobacco are a bad joke and pesticides have been implicated in
macular degeneration..

You might consider substituting pesticide and o r radiation
exposure when you come across smoking being associated
with a chronic illness.

In reference;

Potent Pesticides Used On Tobacco - CBS News
Tobacco pesticides include some of the most dangerous
pesticides used in the United States ... urging him to
support federal regulation of tobacco products, ...

A simple Google search on "tobacco radiation" reveals articles on

The US Surgeon General C Everett Koop stated on
national television in 1990 that tobacco radiation is
probably responsible for 90% of tobacco-related cancer.8 ... - 15k

John William Gofman MD was a part of the Manhattan Project
that made the bomb. To quote him,
"Our estimate is that about three-quarters of the current
annual incidence of breast cancer in the United States is
being caused by earlier ionizing radiation, primarily from
medical sources". John William Gofman MD . Book on line -
Preventing Breast Cancer

In reference to macular degeneration;

Retinal Degeneration and Other Eye Disorders in Wives of Farmer
Pesticide Applicators Enrolled in the Agricultural Health Study ,
American Journal of Epidemiology 2005 161(11):1020-1029;

Mercury (including ingested dental fillings) might also
play a role with macular degeneration, with regard to
the low dose cumulative effects of such combinations
with pesticide exposures.

JAMA -- Mercury in Dental Amalgam--A Neurotoxic Risk?,
JAMA, April 19, 2006;295:1835-1836.
Dental amalgam, which contains 50% mercury
by weight, has been used for at least 150 years.

Journal of Occupational and Environmental Medicine -
Parkinson's Disease, Macular Degeneration and
Cutaneous Signs of Mercury Toxicity ...
None of the patients in the control group had a
cutaneous eruption and ... .. -

Considering Cumulative Effects Under
the National Environmental Policy Act

U.S. Lags in Toxicity Testing,
Wednesday, May 3, 2000, Los Angeles Times
Of the 1,400 known cancer causing chemicals, less
than six percent are tracked in cancers. Congressional Report.


Published peer reviewed medical journal articles with
regard to mycoplasma's and the association of numerous
chronic illness are posted at
The author of hundreds of peer reviewed medical journal
articles is behind the web page at
Garth Nicolson. The section on "Biological Weapons"
at his web page does mention that mycoplasma's are
classified as an "Incapacitating Agent" (non-lethal).

Also note an article from Political Affairs

"113 Institutions Charged with Refusing to
Reveal Biotech Research"
by Sherwood Ross

The Sunshine Project;
Oversight of Research Involving Biological Weapons Agents
Regulation, Committees, Safety, and the Law (and Lack Thereof)

The Gulf War Vets have posted
"Beyond Treason"

Alternate blog:

Alternate MySpace pfofile:

The Toxic Reverend
The report on depleted uranium in the
San Francisco Bay area causing the high
rates of cancer is posted at:>

"Justice Is Homeless"

expand module

Toxic Chemicals and Chroic Illnesses

collapse module

Criminalization of Homelessness

Justice Is Homeless
collapse module

Congregation Members: Toxic Revelations

view all 70
members » Toxic Reve... link to this profile: