sacred buffalo breath
Pennsylvania

Join sacred buffalo breath on tribe.net today!

sacred buffalo breath has invited you to join him at Tribe.net.

Chewing Cud

Poor Denmark. So confused.

   Wed, May 16, 2007 - 8:53 AM
Parliamentary candidate, 25, finds herself at centre of Europe-wide controversy



In the land that launched the cartoons war between Islam and the west, Asmaa Abdol-Hamid finds herself on the frontline, gearing up for a new battle.

The 25-year-old social worker, student and town councillor describes herself as a feminist, a democrat, and a socialist. She has gay friends, opposes the death penalty, supports abortion rights, and could not care less what goes on in other people's bedrooms. In short, a tolerant Scandinavian and European.

She is also a Palestinian and a devout Muslim who insists on wearing a headscarf, who refuses, on religious grounds, to shake hands with males, and who is bidding fair to be the first Muslim woman ever to enter the Folketing, the Danish parliament in Copenhagen.

For the extreme right, the young activist is a political provocateur, an agent of Islamic fundamentalism bent on infiltrating the seat of Danish democracy. To many on the left, Ms Abdol-Hamid is also problematic, personifying through her dress the reactionary repression of women and an illiberal religious agenda that should have no place in her leftwing "red-green" alliance of socialists and environmentalists.

As a result of announcing her parliamentary candidacy earlier this month, the young Muslim and Danish citizen has been thrust to the centre of a debate tormenting Denmark and the rest of western Europe - on the place and values of Islam in modern Europe and the treatment of large Muslim minorities.

Ms Abdol-Hamid is unfazed. "I see more Islam here in Denmark than in Iran or in other places in the Middle East," she says. "It's easier to be a Muslim in Denmark than in Saudi Arabia. I don't feel a stranger here. I'm interested in politics. I want to talk about this society, about political issues. But I'm not in politics because I'm a Muslim."

Her ambition, combined with her insistence on flaunting her religious affiliation, have outraged the Danish political establishment and triggered a new bout of soul-searching almost two years after the publication of cartoons of the Prophet ignited violence and protest across the Islamic world.

"This goes far beyond the extreme right," says Toger Seidenfaden, editor of the Politiken daily newspaper. "Asmaa is insisting on the right to be a religious Muslim and that's provoking broad debate among the public."

The key issue is the headscarf and whether it can be accommodated in parliament. This month Ms Abdol-Hamid gained the candidacy for a safe Copenhagen seat for the leftwing Unity List.

The Danish People's Party or DFP, the far-right movement that unofficially props up the weak centre-right government of the prime minister, Anders Fogh Rasmussen, is on the warpath. A couple of DFP politicians compared the headscarf to the Nazi swastika. One described the prospective MP as "brainwashed".

"We don't like the idea of her performing as an Islamist in the parliament," says DFP spokesman Kim Eskildsen. "We find it wrong that she'll use the parliament as a tool for Islamism ... We don't consider this woman a Nazi. But the way the headscarf is used is comparable to other totalitarian symbols."

The happiest country in the world, according to one detailed survey of international living standards and public attitudes, Denmark is economically highly successful, with the lowest unemployment in the EU.

For the country's 200,000 Muslims and immigrants, however, that happiness is increasingly somewhere else. By virtue of the DFP's influence on the centre-right government, Denmark has enacted the tightest anti-immigration legislation in Europe in recent years.

Many Danes married to foreigners now commute into Copenhagen every day from the southern Swedish town of Malmo across the bridge linking the two cities because they cannot obtain residence for their spouses at home.

Ms Abdol-Hamid, who shares a one-room council flat with one of her six sisters in the "ghetto" of Vollsmose, in the town of Odense, says her political mission is to fight for this underclass.

"This is such a rich country. But we have people in Denmark in deep poverty and nobody helps them. For me the welfare system is very close to Islam. But we need to change the government."

But conservative Muslim leaders are also disapproving of her activism.

"Some Muslims don't think it's right for a female to act like this. They go to my father and tell him, get her married, get her married," she laughs. "Others think you can't be Muslim and Danish at the same time. Some of the Muslims and the extreme right are just the same.

"And there are women in my party who say that anyone who wears the headscarf is oppressed. It's like they think I'm dumb. They're taking away my individuality. We need the right to choose. It's up to us whether or not we wear headscarves.

"They think I'm a woman from the Middle East. No. I'm a Danish Muslim."

www.guardian.co.uk/internat...0,00.html



13 Comments

add a comment
Wed, May 16, 2007 - 10:20 AM
Ah the joys of intolerance and all the signs of a group of people who are to lazy to learn...

Hope she wins ;)
Wed, May 16, 2007 - 12:14 PM
thanks for posting this enlightening article!
Wed, May 16, 2007 - 7:44 PM
Nordic Culture
Yeah, being familiar with Nordic culture this comes as no surprise for me. I realize the Scandinavian people seem very enlightend from our distance, but they can be pretty intolerant and they seem to have a special distain for Islam.

This is my take on it: Islam is here to stay. Its not going to go away. Within Islam there is a good amount of choice. Sufi's, moderate and progressive Muslims are frequently overlooked when people discuss Islam in occidental countries. The wise thing to do would be to embrace these tolerant denominations of the faith.

Asma Abd-Hamid appears to be a progressive. Yes, progressives sometimes do wear hijab. Why? because it is their right. People make this mistake of thinking that when a woman is wearing a scarf on thier head it means they are forced to do so. That cirtainly isn't the case in the West.

From what I've heard from the sisters is that they choose to wear hijab/chador for a number of reasons, but the biggest one seems to be self-respect, meaning, they don't want to be sexually objectified.

Whatever reasons a woman would choose to wear a head scarf, or not wear one is entirely her own and should be respected, no matter what.

Thanks, Whitney, for posting this.
Thu, May 17, 2007 - 12:43 PM
It seems that politicians are the same everywhere.

They want to be able to stamp an easy label on their opponent and be able to point that out as a reason that they shouldn't get the seat that they are trying for.

Moderate and liberal muslims are harder to oppose so then they "should" be stripped of their symbology because they aren't really THAT muslim and it confuses (creates tolerance in) the public.
Thu, May 17, 2007 - 12:45 PM
Asmaa Abdol-Hamid
you go girl!!
Mon, May 21, 2007 - 8:20 AM
ISLAM / MUSLIMS in Scandinavia
As a Scandinavian citizen I am very surprized that you all on this forum are able to judge us all as intolerent -
Try as a Scandinavian to travel to the muslim countries and act as a typical Scandinavian...
The consequences wiil by far over exceed those faced by candidate Asmaa Abdol -Hamid.

Scandinavia are in combination the largest contributers of aid to third world countries - I do not consider myself as intolerent but I am realistic enough not to settle down in Jeddah Saudia Arabia opening a pork meat restaurent with danish beer on the menu.

Likewise if citizens in our region find it hard to practise their religion - that obviously means everything to them - why not leave this cold rainy intolerent region and move to the middle east - there is several beautyfull countries there where Islam is the main relegion - There Muslims are able to practise their religion to the fulllest along with citizens having the same faith.

I welcome every muslim in scandinavia - but please do understand we as a majority - do not wish our beautyfull region to be governed as we see countries governed in north african / middle east / arab region - I am sure Asmaa would rather live in Denmark than in Saudia Arabia or Iran....
But you must remember that the reason why Denmark, Norway, Sweden are among the 10 best countries to live in - worldwide in every aspect - is due to the way our system / democracy works - so when someone tries to force a tradition down on us dictated by relgion and not by common sence - we will stop it right there....she is welcome aslo as a Danish MP but she as everyone else will have follow our rules and in this case you do not wear a bandana nor a stetson or a helmet in the danish parliment....and not a scarf....
Mon, May 21, 2007 - 10:15 AM
Martin,

You were doing a great job until the last paragraph. If she was trying to force other women to wear a scarf, I would agree with you, but she isn't. Let it be her personal choice.
Mon, May 21, 2007 - 12:14 PM
Islam / Muslims - Denmark
Ok your right on that - but her wish is to enter the Danish Parliment which by me is okay - however I do beleive that she needs to adjust her dress code and behaviour according the existing rules within the Parliment as does all the Danish members of the Parliment.

I have muslim friends in The United Arab Emirates and in India and enjoy being with them as long as we respect each others and when I am with them in their country I humble myself to their customs.
Mon, May 21, 2007 - 4:35 PM
Martin,

So it is tradition in the Danish parliment that no MP can display religous symbols while in parliment? Or is it that they can't wear headgear?

If it is the first, then bar everyone who wears a cross/crucifix as well. If it is the second, would a Scandinavian Danish woman be barred from wearing a scarf if see choose to do it one day?

BTW: Do the Danes have a law that seperates church and state? If so, then the government shouldn't be telling her what to wear or not because of religous reasons. Or is it the reverse, like France, where the seperation is so strict that religion and state can never cross paths (this is in part for safety at schools wear fights break-out due to religious symbols, France is now ~25% Islamic)?
Fri, May 25, 2007 - 2:40 AM
Danish Law / Religion and State
Sorry for the somewhat late reply...(was on travel)
First of all it is not prohibitied to wear religious symbols - it is not allowed to wer headgear due
to etikette - as if you are in a nice restaurant or in a formal meeting - you will not be there with your New York Giants Cap
on the head - We do seperate religion and state - however we do have a church minister the reigns over the churches and the protestant priests. but several religions are approved in Denmark as "genuine" religions including Islam - during the Mohammed Drawing scandal
Some of the Imams travelling out of Denmark were deviating from the truth by saying that Islam wasn´t approved in Denmark.

I was in Abu Dhabi (UAE) in the period and one of the large news papers there (Khaleej Times) had an editorial saying "If Jyllands POsten Newspaper is the voice of Denmart? Is Osama Bin Laden then the voice of all Muslims?" I think that really shows the total misunderstanding here...Is all Americans like George Bush??
Fri, May 25, 2007 - 2:42 AM
Spelling
Sorry for the typing errors I hope you understand...(,")
Mon, May 28, 2007 - 12:08 PM
the road hell is paved with good intention
I am very much afraid that Asmaa does mix religion and politics. She does not wear a veil because she thinks it's fancy, sexy or that it makes her look better. She wears it out of religion convictions, thus she is making a statement, and not a small one. She pledges allegiance to her faith and wants everyone to be aware of it. I have no problem with that (although I do not understand, but I respect that choice). Yet, entering a Parliament with such a statement is de facto bringing in religion into public matters. And this is very dangerous.

Asmaa pretends she considers religion as a private matter, but by dispaying her faith with her hidjab, she turns it into a public matter, she abolishes the separation of church and State.

And I would bring forward the same arguments if she were a Sikh, a Jew, a Christian, a Bouddhist or even an atheist who would find it necessary to exhibit his/her atheism through a specific symbol... male or female.
Tue, May 29, 2007 - 1:57 PM
It was stated that religious symbols are not disallowed in the parliament. So the issue is one of custom of the majority -enshrined in law- vs religious rule of minority.

Personally I hope everyone will outgrow the need for organized religion as quickly as possible. But I'm aware that outlawing things -especially ideas- tends to make them stronger. In a world in which change comes slowly and by stages, I can see some very good things that might come of a Muslim public figure who embraces the positions this woman embraces.

In the realm of government, the law will be enforced. So for this woman it will be a question of how much shes willing to fight for the law to be changed, or to sacrifice (her political carer?) in order to make a statement.

Maybe she'll have to get creative.

hmm, I wonder: if Sharia only requires hair to be covered, I wonder what would be the ruling about a shaved head?