Chewing Cud
Fraud Protection fraud
Thu, May 1, 2008 - 8:29 PMPoplicks breaks it down thusly:
"The big deal is that 20% of black voters in Indiana do not currently have a valid photo ID.
The big deal is that almost none of the enacted or proposed Voter ID laws provide measures to help voters obtain the necessary identification or offer alternative ways of voting.
The big deal is that these laws are being passed despite no nationwide widespread evidence of fraud caused by voter impersonation. (In Indiana, there was literally not one reported incident of fraud, which the Supreme Court acknowledged.)
The big deal is that our courts seem interested in a nonexistent form of voter fraud, but could not care less about more widespread evidence of voter fraud in Florida (2000), Ohio (2004), or the New York primary (2008)."
And so on. Go read: poplicks.com/2008/04/our...ow-laws.html
Thu, May 1, 2008 - 8:29 PM -
permalink -
3 Comments
3 Comments |
add a comment |
|
Thu, May 1, 2008 - 8:35 PM
gregpalast.com
Check out Armed Madhouse, this is the third time this is happening. |
|
Thu, May 1, 2008 - 9:59 PM
In 1776 a group of people signed a document in protest of a non-responsive government and things got bloody.
In 1861, in protest over an elected candidate for president whom they though didn't represent there interests, a group tried to make a seperate government to uphold their way of life. Things got very bloody and we still talk about the ramifications today. In the late 1950's and early 1960's, a group protested for equal rights and protection under the law. Although things got bloody, it could have been much worse if the government hadn't accepted that this was over due. What next and how bloody will it get? |
|
Thu, May 1, 2008 - 10:49 PM
It might get very bloody.
This is sad. What I would love to see if a funding program (privately run just to give them a good FU) that funds ID's (and the needed supporting documents) for those that do not have them nor can afford them. |
